PIPS - Chinese Version
Xie CJ, Xu XH, Ou MJ, & Chen YY (2021). Chinese Version of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale for Cancer Patients Reporting Chronic Pain. Cancer Nursing, 44(3):180-189. https://doi.org/10.1097/ncc.0000000000000772
The Chinese Translation of the PIPS scale is at the end of the article.
AAQ-II in Chinese
CAO Jing, JI Yang, & ZHU Zhuo-Hong (2013). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Second Edition（AAQ-Ⅱ）in college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 11, 873-877.
Chun-Qing Zhang, Pak-Kwong Chung, Gangyan Si & Jing Dong Liu (2014). Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II for Chinese College Students and Elite Chinese Athletes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(4), 256-270. DOI: 10.1177/0748175614538064
MPFI - Chinese Validation
Fang, S., Huang, M., & Ding, D. (2023). Factor structure and measurement invariance of the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI) in Chinese samples. Current Psychology, 43(13), 11673-11687.
Liu Dandan, Liu Jian, Shen Xinxin, et al. (2023). 多维心理灵活性量表简版的效度和信度检验 [Validity and reliability test of the short version of the multidimensional psychological flexibility scale.]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 37(6), 538-544.
CPAQ - Chinese
Cheung MN, Wong TC, Yap JC, Chen PP. (2009) Validation of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) in Cantonese-speaking Chinese patients. J Pain, 9(9):823-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.005
Liu, Y., Wang, L., Wei, Y., Wang, X., Xu, T., & Sun, J. (2016). Validation of a Chinese version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CAPQ) and CPAQ-8 in chronic pain patients. Medicine, 95(33), e4339. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004339
BEAQ - Chinese Validation
Cao, H. et al (2021) Chinese validation of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) in college students. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 19, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.01.004 The BEAQ translation in Simplified Chinese is in the Appendix.
Measures in Chinese (中文)
- AADQ - Chinese
- AAQ-II - Chinese
- AAQ-AHL - Chinese
- AAQ-MCHL - Chinese
- AAQ for Cancer - Chinese
- AFQ-Y8 - Chinese
- ASQ - Chinese
Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire - Chinese Validity
ZHANG Wei-Chen, JI Yang, LI Xin, GUO Hui-Na, ZHU Zhuo-Hong (2014) Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2014, Issue 1, 40-44. Retrieved from China/Asia On Demand
Li, P., Bai, S., & Zhang, R. (2019).
Objective: Exploring the effect of acceptance and commitment therapy with physical education curriculum as a carrier on the mental health of college students, and providing new ideas for improving the mental health of college students.
Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on depression
目的:旨在追踪比较接受与承诺疗法（ACT）与认知行为疗法（CBT）对于抑郁的干预效果。方法:选取27名高抑郁且高穷思竭虑大学生进行为期6周的团体干预,CBT组14人（8男,6女）,ACT组13人（4男,9女）,分3个时间点（干预前1周、干预结束当天、干预后9周）追踪测量被试的抑郁与穷思竭虑。结果:数据分析采用多元多层线性模型,固定效应结果显示,ACT组抑郁与穷思竭虑均呈持续下降趋势,而CBT组仅有抑郁下降趋势显著;随机效应结果显示,ACT组抑郁与穷思竭虑的斜率呈正相关,而CBT组二者斜率呈负相关。结论:CBT不能有效缓解抑郁个体的穷思竭虑,因而干预抑郁的即时效果显著但长期效果可能欠缺;ACT干预抑郁的即时与长期效果都很显著。