Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory - German (MPFI-G, v1.0, 2/2022)

Quellenhinweis: Rolffs, J. L., Rogge, R. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2016). Disentangling Components of Flexibility via the Hexaflex Model Development and Validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). Assessment, 1073191116645905. 

Deutsche Bearbeitung von K. Ackermann

Suchardová, S. (2023). Krátká intervence ACT jako preventivní program ke zvýšení kognitivní flexibility u žáků středních škol. Thesis: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. Retrieved from https://theses.cz/id/yz2xvg/Suchardova__DP.pdf The AFQ-Y Czech version is in the appendix.

Krimmel, K.L. (2015) Het meten van psychologische flexibiliteit: een pilot onderzoek naar de psychometrische eigenschappen van de avoidance and fusion questionnaire bij volwassen patiënten die een bariatrische ingreep ondergaan. Thesis, Universiteit of Twente. The Dutch AFQ-Y is at the end of the article.

Blokzijl, R. (2005). Measuring Acceptance-Related Constructs Among Youngsters: Evaluation of the Dutch Willingness and Action Measure for Children and Adolescents (WAM-C/A) and the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Thesis, University of Leiden.

Click here for het Nederlandse taalgebied vertaling gemaakt van de AFQ-Y.
 

Christodoulou, A., Michaelides, M. P., & Karekla, M. (2018). Greek Version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth: Psychometric Evaluation and Gender Multigroup Invariance in Adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(8), 844–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917713500
Abstract
The Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth–Eight-Item Short Version (AFQ-Y8) assesses psychological inflexibility in youth. The present study is the first to examine alternative measurement models for the Greek adaptation of the AFQ-Y8, latent associations with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II (AAQ-II), gender-group invariance, and latent mean comparisons between males and females. In total, 432 students from seven high schools in Cyprus participated in the study. Both a unidimensional and a two-dimensional model had excellent fit, although the one-factor solution was substantively superior. The correlation of the latent AFQ-Y8 factor with AAQ-II was strong and positive, indicating good convergent validity. Finally, the unidimensional AFQ-Y8 model was found to be invariant for gender and no latent means difference was detected between males and females.

Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth

Greco, L.A., Murrell, A.R., & Coyne, L.W. (2005). The Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Available from the first author and online at www.contextualscience.org.

Greco, L.A., Lambert, W., & Baer, R.A. (2008). Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence: Development and evaluation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 93-102.

Traduzione Italiana (1.0) a cura di Rossi, E., Melchiorri, E., Francesconi, C., Violini, P., Cioci, M., Ristè, N. (2013) AISCC, Gruppo Ricerca ACT.

Traduzione Italiana (2.0) a cura di Melchiorri, E., Rossi, E., Ristè, N., Violini, P., Lijoi, E., (2014) AISCC, Gruppo Ricerca ACT.

Referenza bibliografica: Rossi, E., Melchiorri, E., Violini, P., Lijoi, E., Ristè, N., Panzera, A. (2014). Validation study of the Italian Version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Poster presented at ACBS World Conference 12 Poster Session - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - June 17-22, 2014.

Schweiger, M., Ristallo, A., Oppo, A., Pergolizzi, F., Presti, G., & Moderato, P. (2017). Ragazzi in lotta con emozioni e pensieri: la validazione della versione italiana dell’ Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (I-AFQ-Y) [Youths struggling with emotions and thoughts: validation of the Italian version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (I-AFQ-Y)]. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 23(2), 141–162.

Compare, L., Martucci, C., Bernini, O., Cincidda, C. & Berrocal, C. (2021) Proprietà psicometriche dell'Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y) in soggetti di 6-11 anni [Psychometric properties of Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y) in children aged between 6-11]. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 27(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/doi:10.14605/PCC2712103

Il presente studio è in corso di aggiornamento.

Per informazioni: segreteria@aiscc.it – www.aiscc.it

Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y) is a measure of the psychological inflexibility of adolescents from childhood to adolescence.
There are 17 items AFQ-Y and 8 items shortened version AFQ-Y8. AFQ-Y has a one-factor structure.

Ishizu, K., Shimoda, Y., & Ohtsuki, T. (2014) Developing the scale regarding psychological inflexibility in Japanese early adolescence.
Poster presented at 30th Annual Pacific Rim International Conference on Disability and Diversity, Honolulu

The AFQ-Y Japanese Version is on the ACBS Japan Chapter website.

Shabani, M., Mohsenabadi, H., Zanjani, Z., Assarian, F. (2019). Evaluation of psychometric properties of Persian version of Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ – Y). Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 21(5), 325-333. http://doi.org/10.22038/jfmh.2019.14804

Hekmati, I. et al (2020) Persian adaptation of avoidance and fusion questionnaire for youth (AFQ-Y): A preliminary examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 17, 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.05.004

Cunha, M. & Santos, A.M. (2011) Avaliação da Inflexibilidade Psicológica em Adolescentes: Estudo das qualidades psicométricas da versão portuguesa do Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Laboratório de Psicologia, 9(2), 133-146. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/235397938.pdf

Cunha, M., Oliveira, S., Coimbra, M. et al. (2023). Assessing Psychological Inflexibility in Adolescents: A Validation Study of the Portuguese Short Version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Child Youth Care Forum, 52, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-022-09679-9

Se presenta la versión española validada del Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y).
El texto completo de la validación se puede encontrar en:
Valdivia-Salas, S., Martín-Albo, Zaldívar, P.J.L., Lombas, S., & Jiménez, T.I. (2017). Spanish validation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Assessment, 24(7), 919-931. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116632338

Salaza, D.M. et al (2019) Psychometric properties of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire – Youth in Colombia. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.11.008 

García-Rubio, C., Lecuona, O., Blanco Donoso, L. M., Cantero-García, M., Paniagua, D., & Rodríguez-Carvajal, R. (2020). Spanish validation of the short-form of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire (AFQ-Y8) with children and adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 32(4), e15–e27. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000801

Detta test mäter det psykologiska konstruktet ”psykologisk inflexibilitet”, eller dess motsats ”psykologisk flexibilitet” om man vänder på numreringen. Testet är framtaget för ungdomar 12-18 år. Men har även visat sig fungera bra för vuxna. Både AFQ-Y8 samt den längre versionen, AFQ-Y17 finns validerade för svenska förhållanden. I denna artikel finns testets psykometriska egenskaper beskrivna. En konklusion i denna artikel är att AFQ-Y8 är att föredra. I denna artikel summeras även all forskning internationell forskning som är gjord och vetenskapligt publicerad på AFQ-Y till och med januari 2016. Både forskning på unga och vuxna. Du hittar AFQ-Y8 här och AFQ-Y17 här.

Referenser:
[1] Livheim, F., Tengström, A., Bond, F. W., Gerhard Andersson, G., Dahl, J. & Rosendahl, I. (2016). Psychometric Properties of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth: A Psychological Measure of Psychological Inflexibility in youth. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(2), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.04.001
Se länk till artikeln här. 

[2] Thorsell Cederberg, J., Weineland, S., Dahl, J., Ljungman,G. (2018) A preliminary validation of the Swedish short version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y8) for children and adolescents with cancer. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 10, 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.09.004

Chen Yanhong, Zhao Ying, Duan Yanmei, Bai Xiaoyu, Wang Shujuan, & Zhu Zhuohong. (2019). 青少年回避与融合问卷简版的信效度分析 [Reliability and validity analysis of the short version of the adolescent avoidance and fusion questionnaire]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(6), 1192-1195, 1114.

Seong-Hye Choi (아주대학교), Eun-Jung Kim(아주대학교) (2016) Psychological Inflexibility in Korean Children and Adolescents : Validation of the Korean Version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth-Eight Item Type (K-AFQ-Y8). Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35(3), 600 - 614.

Choi Seong-Hye, Kim Eun-Jeong (2015) Assessing Psychological Inflexibility in Childhood and Adolescence : Validation of the Korean Version of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth(K-AFQ-Y). Congnitive Behavior Therapy in Korea, 15(3), 595 - 617.

Büyüköksüz, E., & Erözkan, A. (2019). Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire –Youth 8 (AFQ-Y8): Factor Structure and Reliability Studies in Turkish Culture. Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research. 8(Supplement 1): 3-7.

Büyüköksüz, E., & Erözkan, A. (2019). Kaçınma ve Birleşme Ölçeği-Gençler 8 (KBÖ-G8): Türk Kültüründe Faktör Yapısı ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research. 8(Supplement 1): 3-7.

The Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y; Greco, Murrell, & Coyne, 2005) is a 17-item measure that asks respondents to rate how true each item is for them (0 = Not at All True; 4 = Very True). Items are tied to ACT’s model of human suffering and were generated to represent a theoretically cohesive conceptualization of psychological inflexibility fostered by: (1) Cognitive fusion (e.g., “My thoughts and feelings mess up my life,” “The bad things I think about myself must be true”); (2) Experiential avoidance (e.g., “I push away thoughts and feelings that I don’t like”); and (3) Inaction or behavioral ineffectiveness in the presence of unwanted internal experiences (e.g., “I can’t be a good friend when I feel upset”).

Consistent with the theory underlying acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), items converged into a 17-item scale (AFQ-Y) and an 8-item short form (AFQ-Y8). Results of classical test theory, factor analysis, and item response theory support the psychometric properties of the 17-item version of the AFQ-Y and AFQ-Y8. Overall, research suggests that the AFQ-Y may be a useful and child-friendly measure of core ACT processes.

Reference

Greco, L. A., Lambert, W., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence: Development and evaluation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 93-102.

Rajaeiramsheh, F., Rezaie, Z., Davoudi, M. et al. (2021) Psychometric properties of the Persian versions of acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire (AADQ) and the diabetes acceptance and action scale (DAAS), in Iranian youth with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Metab Disord, 20, 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00796-1 The Persian version of the AADQ-YR is in the Supplementary Information.

Viñas, F., Malo, S., González, M., Navarro, D., & Casas, F. (2015). Assessing Mindfulness on a Sample of Catalan-Speaking Spanish Adolescents: Validation of the Catalan Version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure. The Spanish journal of psychology, 18, E46. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.48

Chen, X., Liang, K., Huang, L., Mu, W., Dong, W., Chen, S., Chen, S., & Chi, X. (2022).The Psychometric Properties and Cutoff Score of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) in Chinese Primary School Students. Children, 9(4), 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9040499

Suchardová, S. (2023). Krátká intervence ACT jako preventivní program ke zvýšení kognitivní flexibility u žáků středních škol. Thesis: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. Retrieved from https://theses.cz/id/yz2xvg/Suchardova__DP.pdf The CAMM Czech version is in the appendix.

de Bruin, E.I., Zijlstra, B.J.H. & Bögels, S.M. (2014). The Meaning of Mindfulness in Children and Adolescents: Further Validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) in Two Independent Samples from The Netherlands. Mindfulness 5, 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0196-8

Roux, B., Franckx, A.-C. Lahaye, M., Deplus, S. & Philippot, P. (2019). A French validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée. 69(3), 83-89. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2019.06.001

Dion, J., Paquette, L., Daigneault, I., Godbout, N., & Hébert, M. (2018). Validation of the French Version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) Among Samples of French and Indigenous Youth. Mindfulness, 9(2), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0807-x

Letellier, S. (2018) Validation du «Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure» (CAMM) et du «Acceptance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth» (AFQ-Y) auprès d’enfants québécois de 8 à 12 ans. Université de Sherbrooke, Dissertation. Retrieved from https://savoirs.usherbrooke.ca/handle/11143/13577
The French CAMM is in Appendix D.

Theofanous, A., Ioannou, M., Zacharia, M., Georgiou, S. N., & Karekla, M. (2020). Gender, Age, and Time Invariance of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) and Psychometric Properties in Three Greek-Speaking Youth Samples. Mindfulness, 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01350-5

Children's Acceptance and Mindfulness Measure

Greco, L. A., Smith, G., & Baer, R. A. (2009). Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Chidlren’s Acceptance and Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Unpublished manuscript. St. Louis: University of Missouri.

Traduzione Italiana (2.0) a cura di Rossi, E., Melchiorri, E., Violini, P., Lijoi, E., Ristè, N.,(2014) AISCC, Gruppo Ricerca ACT.

Referenza bibliografica: Melchiorri, E., Rossi, E., Ristè, N., Violini, P., Lijoi, E., Panzera, A. (2014). Development and validation study of the Italian Version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM . Poster presented at ACBS World Conference 12 Poster Session - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - June 17-22, 2014.

Ristallo, A., Schweiger, M., Oppo, A. Pergolizzi, F. Presti, G. & Moderato, P. (2016). Misurare la mindfulness in età evolutiva: proprietà psicometriche e struttura fattoriale della versione italiana della Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (I-CAMM). Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 22. DOI: 10.1037/t61201-000. 

Il presente studio è in corso di aggiornamento.

Per informazioni: segreteria@aiscc.it – www.aiscc.it
 

Mohsenabadi, H. and Shabani, M.J. and Assarian, F. & Zanjani, Z. (2020). Psychometric properties of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure: A psychological measure of mindfulness in youth. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 14 (1). http://eprints.iums.ac.ir/23950/

Cunha, M., Galhardo, A., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2013). Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM): Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26, 459-468. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000300005

Guerra, J., García-Gómez, M., Turanzas, J., Cordón, J.R., Suárez-Jurado, C., & Mestre, J.M. (2019). A Brief Spanish Version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). A Dispositional Mindfulness Measure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8), 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081355  The CAMM Spanish Translation is in Appendix A.

García-Rubio, C., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Langer, A. I., Paniagua, D., Steinebach, P., Andreu, C. I., Vara, M. D., & Cebolla, A. (2019). Validation of the Spanish Version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) with Samples of Spanish and Chilean Children and Adolescents. Mindfulness, 10(8), 1502–1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01108-8

Gustin-García, M. G., & Alegre-Bravo, A. A. (2021). Validación de Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure en escolares de Lima, Perú. Revista Evaluar, 21(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v21.n2.34398

 Zeynep Aydin Sünbül (2018). Psychometric Evaluation of Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) with Turkish Sample. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 7(2), 56-59.

The CAMM Turkish translation is here.

 

Rajaeiramsheh, F., Rezaie, Z., Davoudi, M. et al. (2021) Psychometric properties of the Persian versions of acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire (AADQ) and the diabetes acceptance and action scale (DAAS), in Iranian youth with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Metab Disord, 20, 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00796-1 The DAAS Persian Translation is in the article's Supplementary Information.

Black, D. S., Sussman, S., Johnson, C. A., & Milam, J. (2012). Psychometric Assessment of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) Among Chinese Adolescents. Assessment, 19(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111415365

de Bruin, E.I., Zijlstra, B.J.H., van de Weijer-Bergsma, E. et al. (2011) The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale for Adolescents (MAAS-A): Psychometric Properties in a Dutch Sample. Mindfulness, 2, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0061-6

Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale - Adolescent (Day to Day Experiences)

Brown, K. W., West, A. M., Loverich, T. M., & Biegel, G. M. (2011). Assessing adolescent mindfulness: Validation of an adapted Mindfulness
Attention Awareness Scale in adolescent normative and psychiatric populations. Psychological Assessment, 23, 1023–1033.

Referenza bibliografica: Rossi, E., Melchiorri, E., Panzera., A., Ristè, N., Carloni, V., Romitelli M. (2015). Validation study of the Italian version of the Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale for Adolescents (MAAS-A). Poster presented at ACBS World Conference 13 Poster Session – Berlin, German- July 14-19, 2015.

Il presente studio è in corso di aggiornamento.

Per informazioni: segreteria@aiscc.it – www.aiscc.it

Smith, O. R. F., Melkevik, O., Samdal, O., Larsen, T. M., & Haug, E. (2017). Psychometric properties of the five-item version of the Mindful Awareness Attention Scale (MAAS) in Norwegian adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 45(4), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817699321

Mohsenabadi, H. and Shabani, M.J. and Zanjani, Z. (2019) Factor structure and reliability of the mindfulness attention awareness scale for adolescents and the relationship between mindfulness and anxiety in adolescents. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 13 (1).

Calvete, E.,  Sampedro, A., Orue, I. (2014) PROPIEDADES PSICOMÉTRICAS DE LA VERSIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE LA “ESCALA DE ATENCIÓN Y CONCIENCIA PLENA PARA ADOLESCENTES” (MINDFUL ATTENTION AWARENESS SCALE for ADOLESCENTS) (MAAS-A). Behavioral Psychology / Psicología Conductual, 22(2), 277-291

Turan, M . (2020). Bilinçli Farkındalık Ölçeği Ergen Formu’nun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Eğitim ve Toplum Özel sayısı, Cilt 16, 5608 - 5625. http://doi.org/10.26466/opus.683364

LI, Z., YANG, L.,  ZHU, L., & ZHU, Z. (2018) A preliminary study of validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Parental Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 32(2), 166-173. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2018.02.014

Wiwe Lipsker, C., Kanstrup, M., Holmström, L., Kemani, M., & Wicksell, R. K. (2016). The Parent Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire (PPFQ): Item Reduction and Validation in a Clinical Sample of Swedish Parents of Children with Chronic Pain. Children (Basel, Switzerland), 3(4), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/children3040032

Tatsuto Yamada & Yasushi Fujii (2020). Reliability and Validity of the Japanese-Version Parental Acceptance Questionnaire (6-PAQ). Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 258-267. http://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2020.1809198

Fonseca, A., Canavarro, M.C. & Moreira, H. (2020). Is parental psychological flexibility a (uni) dimensional construct? A bifactor analysis of the Portuguese version of the parental acceptance questionnaire (6-PAQ). Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00991-y  The 6-PAQ translation is in the article's supplementary material.

Parental Acceptance Questionnaire (6-PAQ) Spanish Validation: Juan M. Flujas-Contreras, Azucena García-Palacios, Inmaculada Gómez (2020) Spanish validation of the Parental Acceptance Questionnaire (6-PAQ). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 20 (2), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.03.002

Strandberg, S. (2022). Föräldraskap och psykologisk flexibilitet: En studie om prediktorer för utbrändhet, lidande och subjektiv livskvalitet hos föräldrar med och utan barn med kroniska tillstånd. Thesis. Karlstads Universitet. The Swedish transaltion of the 6-PAQ is in the appendix.

Seung-Min Kim(서울여자대학교), Kyung Park(서울여자대학교) (2017) Korean Adaptation of the Parental Acceptance Questionnaire(K-4-PAQ). THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, Vol.22 No.3, pages 531 - 549.

References:

Yuki, M. & Hiroshi, S. (2018). Development of the Japanese Version of the Parental Acceptance and Action Questionnaire: A Preliminary Study. 人文論究, 67(4), 45-56. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120006401913/en/

Mizusaki, Y. & Sato, H. (2018). Preliminary study on the preparation of the Japanese version of the Parental Acceptance and Action Questionnaire. Humanit Res of KGU, 67, 45–56.

OKAJIMA, J. & Okajima, I. (2023). Developing and validating the Japanese version of the Parental Acceptance and Action Questionnaire among parents with infants and toddlers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(9), 5674. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20095674

 Navega, A.C. & Cunha, M. (2018) Questionário de Aceitação e Ação para Pais: desenvolvimento da versão portuguesa, estudo da estrutura fatorial e propriedades psicométricas. ISMT, Dissertaion. The Portuguese PAAQ is in the Appendix.
 

Corina Shumi WONG CHEN (2018) Estilos parentales y evitación experiencial en padres de niños con trastorno por déficit de atención con o sin hiperactividad. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Thesis. The Spanish PAAQ is in the Anexo.

Soares, R., Cunha, M., Massano-Cardoso, I., & Galhardo, A. (2023). Assessing psychological flexibility in adolescents: Validation of PsyFlex-A . Portuguese Journal of Behavioral and Social Research, 9(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.31211/rpics.2023.9.1.284

Wang, J., Xu, W., Fu, Z., Yu, W., He, L., Sun, L., He, J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Affective Style Questionnaire and its role as a moderator of the relationship between stress and negative affect. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(5), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316679722

Erreygers, S., & Spooren, P. (2017). Factor Structure of the Affective Style Questionnaire in Flemish Adolescents. Psychologica Belgica, 57(2), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.369 The ASQ Dutch translation is in the Appendix.

Makowski, D., Sperduti, M., Lavallée, S. et al. (2020) Adaptation and Validation of a Short French Version of the Affective Style Questionnaire. J Cogn Ther,13, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-019-00060-8

Graser, J., Bohn, C., Kelava, A., Schreiber, F., Hofmann, S.G, and Stangier, U. (2012). Der „Affective Style Questionnaire (ASQ)”: Deutsche Adaption und Validitäten. Diagnostica, 58(2), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000056

Ito, M. & Hofmann, S.G. (2014) Culture and affect: the factor structure of the affective style questionnaire and its relation with depression and anxiety among Japanese. BMC Res Notes, 7, 590. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-590

하정민, 조용래 (2015) Reliability and Validity of an Korean Version of the Affective Style Questionnaire. Korean Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, 15(2), 401 - 431.

Cecilia Tunberger (2011) Översättning och validering av Affective Style Questionnaire och samband med depression och ångest. Retrieved from https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=2026867&fileOId=2026868
The Swedish ASQ is at the end of the document.

Öz Soysal, F. & Bakalım, O. (2021). Duygu Stilleri Anketi’nin Beliren Yetişkinlik Dönemindeki Bireylerde Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 11(1) , 49-55 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/higheredusci/issue/62177/909406

Graser, J., Heimlich, C., Kelava, A., Hofmann, S.G., Stangier, U. & Schreiber, S. (2019). Erfassung der Emotionsregulation bei Jugendlichen anhand des Affective Style Questionnaire – Youth (ASQ-Y). Diagnostica, 65, 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000210 The ASQ-Y Translation is in the article's supplemental material.

Li, J., Han, Z. R., Gao, M. M., Sun, X., & Ahemaitijiang, N. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 30(5), e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000582

Zhao, Y., Wu, K., Wang, Y. et al. (2021) Construct validity of brief difficulties in emotion regulation scale and its revised version: evidence for a general factor. Curr Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02056-0

Benda, J. (2017) The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form: a pilot study of the Czech version. E-psychologie, Electronic Journal of CMPS, 11(1). Retrieved from https://www.e-psycholog.eu/article/279
The Czech translation of the DERS-SF items is in table 3.

Westerlund, M. & Santtila, P. (2018) A Finnish adaptation of the emotion regulation questionnaire (ERQ) and the difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS-16). Nordic Psychology, 70(4), 304-323. http://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2018.1443279

Sami J. Eloranta, Riittakerttu Kaltiala, Nina Lindberg, Matti Kaivosoja & Kirsi Peltonen (2020) Validating measurement tools for mentalization, emotion regulation difficulties and identity diffusion among Finnish adolescents. Nordic Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2020.1863852

Guylaine Côté, Patrick Gosselin, Isabel Dagenais (2013) Évaluation multidimensionnelle de la régulation des émotions : propriétés psychométriques d’une version francophone du Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale [Psychometric properties of a French version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale]. Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive, 23(2), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcc.2013.01.005

Dan-Glauser, E. S., & Scherer, K. R. (2013). The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS): Factor structure and consistency of a French translation. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000093

Raphael Gutzweiler and Tina In-Albon (2018) Überprüfung der Gütekriterien der deutschen Version der Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale in einer klinischen und einer Schülerstichprobe Jugendlicher. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 47(4), 274-286. https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000506

Ehring, T., Svaldi, J.,  Tuschen-Caffier, B., & Berking, M. (2013) Validierung der Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale–deutsche Version. Manuskript. Universität Münster.

Koushiou, M., & Karekla, M. (2016). Eating disorder risk: The role of sensitivity to negative affect and body-image inflexibility (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus). Retrieved from https://gnosis.library.ucy.ac.cy/handle/7/39530
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) Greek Translation is in Appendix B.

Mitsopoulou, E., Kafetsios, K., Karademas, E. et al. (2013) The Greek Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: Testing the Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity in an Adult Community Sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9321-6

Snow, N., Ward, R., Becker, S. & Raval, V. (2013). Measurement Invariance of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale in India and the United States. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 147-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v3n1p147

References:

Segal, A. & Golan, M. (2016). Differences in emotion regulation along the eating disorder spectrum: Cross sectional study in adolescents out patient care. Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry, 6(1), 00314. DOI: 10.15406/jpcpy.2016.06.00314

Reuveni, I., Dan, R., Segman, R. et al. (2016). Emotional regulation difficulties and premenstrual symptoms among Israeli students. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 19, 1063–1070. Doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0656-y

Bhatnagar Prachi, Shukla Meenakshi, & Pandey Rakesh (2020) Validating the Factor Structure of the Hindi Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 42(2), 377-396. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09796-6

Giromini, L., Velotti, P., de Campora, G., Bonalume, L. & Cesare Zavattini, G. (2012). Cultural Adaptation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: Reliability and Validity of an Italian Version. J. Clin. Psychol., 68, 989-1007. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21876

Sighinolfi, C., Norcini Pala, A., Chiri, L. R., Marchetti, I., & Sica, C. (2010). Difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS): the italian translation and adaptation. PSICOTERAPIA COGNITIVA COMPORTAMENTALE, 16(2), 141–170. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-1148235

Keiji TAKATA, Yoshitake TAKEBAYASHI, Keisuke TANAKA, Ayame TAMURA, Yoshinori SUGIURA (2013) The convergent validity of Japanese version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association, Volume 77, The 77th Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association, Session ID 2EV-038, Pages 2EV-038. https://doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.77.0_2EV-038

Cho, Y., & Hong, S. (2013). The new factor structure of the Korean Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (K-DERS) incorporating method factor. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 46(3), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613484033

조용래 (2007) 정서조절곤란의 평가 한국판 척도의 심리측정적 속성 [Assessing Emotion Dysregulation: Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale.] Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(4), 1015 - 1038.

Šeibokaitė, L., Endriulaitienė, A., Sullman, M. J., Markšaitytė, R., & Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė, K. (2017). Difficulties in emotion regulation and risky driving among Lithuanian drivers. Traffic Injury Prevention, 18, 688-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15389588.2017.1315109

Endre Visted, Lin Sørensen, Berge Osnes, Julie L. Svendsen, Per-Einar Binder, & Elisabeth Schanche (2017) The Association between Self-Reported Difficulties in Emotion Regulation and Heart Rate Variability: The Salient Role of Not Accepting Negative Emotions. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00328

Shahabi, M., Hasani, J., & Bjureberg, J. (2020). Psychometric Properties of the Brief Persian Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (The DERS-16). Assessment for Effective Intervention, 45(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418800210

kermani mamazandi, Z., Tale Pasand, S. (2018). Psychometric Characteristics of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale in Semnan University Students. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation, 11(42), 117-142.

Mazaheri M. (2015). Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) DERS-6 & DERS-5- Revised (in an Iranian Clinical Sample. Iranian journal of psychiatry, 10(2), 115–122.

Cancian, A.C.M. et al. (2019) Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 41(01), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0128

Miguel, F.K., Giromini, L., Colombarolli, M.S., Zuanazzi, A.C., & Zennaro, A. (2017). A Brazilian Investigation of the 36- and 16-Item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scales. J. Clin. Psychol., 73, 1146-1159. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22404

Coutinhom, J. et al. (2010) Versão portuguesa da escala de dificuldades de regulação emocional e sua relação com sintomas psicopatológicos. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo), 37 (4). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832010000400001
 

Bostan, M.C. & Zaharia, D.V. (2016). Emotional dysregulation – factor structure and consistency in the Romanian version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS).  Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii, Alexandru Ioan Cuza, din Iaşi. Psihologie, 2, 57-77. 

Hervas, G., & Jodar, R. (2008). Adaptacion al castellano de la Escala de Dificultades en la Regulacion Emocional. Clınica y Salud, 19, 139156.

Isabel Gómez-Simón, Eva Penelo & Nuria de la Osa (2014) Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Difficulties Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema, 26(3), 401-408. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.324 The Spanish translation is in Table 2.

Reivan-Ortiz, G. G., Rodas, P. E. O., & Reivan Ortiz, P. N. (2020). A Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS): Validity Evidence in Ecuadorian Population. International Journal of Psychological Research, 13(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4325

Navarro, O., Restrepo-Ochoa, D., Rommel, D., Ghalaret, J-M., & Fleury-Bahi, G. (2021). Validation of a brief version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale with a Spanish speaking population (DERS-S SF). Revista CES Psicología, 14(2), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.5360

The Spanish translation of the Difficulties Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form (DERS-SF) can be found at miami.edu.

Olsson, S. (2010). Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale -ett instrument för att undersöka svårigheter med känsloreglering vid Borderline personlighetsstörning. Thesis: Stockholms Universitet/University of Stockholm.  Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?dswid=7400&pid=diva2%3A325427
The DERS Swedish Version is in the Appendix.

Yiğit, İ. &Guzey Yiğit, M. (2019). Psychometric Properties of Turkish Version of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Brief Form (DERS-16). Current Psychology, 38, 1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9712-7

Rugancı, R.N. & Gençöz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 442-455. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20665

Zafar, H., Debowska, A., & Boduszek, D. (2021). Emotion regulation difficulties and psychopathology among Pakistani adolescents. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104520969765

Lavender, J.M, Tull, M.T., DiLillo, D., Messman-Moore, T., & Gratz, K.L. (2017). Development and validation of a state-based measure of emotion dysregulation: The State Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (S-DERS). Assessment, 24 (2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115601218

This Arabic translation of the CFQ has been conducted by Dr Hanan Alsofyani of King Khalid University, files attached are written in arabic. To contact Dr Alsofyani email him at doctorhanan2030@gmail.com 

ALGOS, a research on pain team, has translated CFQ into Catalan and validated it for adolescent population (11-20 years old). A paper with a description of the psychometric properties in a sample of adolescents has been published.

Solé, E., Racine, M., Castarlenas, E., Vega, R. de la, Tomé-Pires, C., Jensen, M., & Miró, J. (2015). The psychometric properties of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire in adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000244

If you need further information, you can contact algos.dolor@urv.cat or Ester Solé (ester.sole@urv.cat).  

ZHANG Wei-Chen, JI Yang, LI Xin, GUO Hui-Na, ZHU Zhuo-Hong (2014) Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2014, Issue 1, 40-44. Retrieved from China/Asia On Demand
Conclusion: CFQ-F中文版具有较好的信效度,可在我国用于认知融合相关研究. Conclusion: The Chinese version of CFQ-F has good reliability and validity and can be used for cognitive fusion related research in China.

王小龙, 曹静, 安静, 丁万兵, 索玉兰, 苏华, 李燕, 祝卓宏, 汤永隆 (2015). 中文接纳与行动问卷第二版(AAQ-II)与认知融合问卷(CFQ)在回族和哈萨克族青少年中的信效度检验. 心理学进展, 5(11), 695-701. [Wang Xiaolong, Cao Jing, Jing Jing, Ding Wanbing, Suo Yulan, Su Hua, Li Yan, Zhu Zhuohong, Tang Yonglong (2015). Chinese Acceptance and Action Questionnaire Second Edition (AAQ-II) and Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ ) in Hui and Kazak adolescents. Advances in Psychology, 5(11) , 695-701.] http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2015.511090

赵雯倩,李小妹,王雯,李璐璐,张蒙悦. (2020). 中文版认知融合问卷在乳腺癌人群中的信效度研究 [Reliability and validity of Chinese version of cognitive fusion questionnaire in breast cancer patients]. Contemporary Nurse, 27(06):25-26.

Dutch translation CFQ13 (September 2011)

The CFQ13 (developed by David Gillanders, Helen Bolderston & Frank Bond), has been translated into Dutch by Tim Batink and Hubert de Mey and is being researched for its psychometric properties. The preliminary results of those studies are promising; the internal validity looks good as well as the correlations with corresponding questionnaires. We are planning to report more elaborate about our results, begin 2012.

The Dutch version of the CFQ13, with some basic information about the psychometric properties and two non-clinical samples is downloadable for ACBS-members.

Tim Batink, Maastricht University & Hubert de Mey, Radboud University
 

Dionne, F., Gagnon, J., Balbinotti, M., Peixoto, E. M., Martel, M.-E., Gillanders, D., & Monestès, J.-L. (2016). "Buying into thoughts”: Validation of a French translation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 48(4), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000053

Dionne, F., Balbinotti, M., Gillanders, D., Gagnon, J., & Monestès, J. L. (2014). Validation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire in a French-speaking population. Poster presentation at ACBS Annual World Conference XII. Minneapolis, MN. The French Translations of the CFQ items are in the poster (See attachment below)

China, C., Hansen, L.B., Gillanders, D.T., Benninghoven, D. (2018) Concept and validation of the German version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ-D). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 9, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.06.003 The German translation of the CFQ is in the Appendix.

Zachariaa, M. et al. (2021). Does Cognitive Fusion show up similarly across two behavioral health samples? Psychometric properties and invariance of the Greek–Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (G-CFQ). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 21, 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.01.003 The Greek CFQ items are in Table 2.

(Login to your ACBS account to see the attachments)

Donati, M. A., Berrocal, C., Bernini, O., Gori, C., & Primi, C. (2021). Measuring cognitive fusion through the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire-7: Measurement invariance across non-clinical and clinical psychological samples. PloS one, 16(2), e0246434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246434 The Italian translation of the CFQ-7 is in Appendix SI.

Oppo, A., Prevedini, A. B., Dell'Orco, F., Dordoni, P., Presti, G., Gillanders, D. T., & Moderato, P. (2019). Fusione e defusione. Adattamento e proprieta psicometriche della versione Italiana del Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (I-CFQ) [Fusion and defusion. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (I-CFQ)]. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 25(1), 53–73.

Researchers from IESCUM, IULM University and ACT Italia are now working at the italian validation of CFQ. Preliminary data had been presented at ACBS Annual World Conference X in Washington DC in 2012 and at XVI AIAMC Conference in Pescara 2012.

Details of these studies can be seen here:

Dell’Orco F., Prevedini A., Oppo A., Presti, G.B., Moderato P.(2012). Validation study of the Italian version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ), poster presentation at ACBS Annual World Conference X Washington 22-25 luglio 2012

Dell’Orco F., Prevedini A., Oppo A., Presti, G.B., Moderato P.(2012). Studio di validazione italiana del Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ), presentation in symposiun at XVI Congresso Associazione Italiana di Analisi e Modificazione del Comportamento - AIAMC, Pescara 25-28 Ottobre 2012. 

For any further information, please write to: francesco.dellorco@iulm.it or annaprevedini@gmail.com

Taiki Shima et al (2016) Examining the validity of the revised Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire 13-item and 7-item editions. Japanese Journal of Behavior Therapy, 42(1), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.24468/jjbt.42.1_73  The CFQ Japanese Translation is in the Appendix.

Kang, R.N., Tanaka, Y., Sato, T., Maeda, S. & Shimada, H. (2023 in press). The Development of a Japanese Version of the State Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Japanese Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12453

Kim, B.  & Cho, S. (2015). Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the cognitive fusion questionnaire. Social Behavior and Personality: International Journal, 43 (1), 1715-1724.  https://doi.org//10.2224/sbp.2015.43.10.1715

Tom Østergaard, Tobias Lundgren, Robert D. Zettle, Nils Inge Landrø, & Vegard Øksendal Haaland (2020) Psychological Flexibility in Depression Relapse Prevention: Processes of Change and Positive Mental Health in Group-Based ACT for Residual Symptoms. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00528

Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire - PERSIAN/FARSI Translation
پرسشنامه ی فیوژن شناختی که به زبان فارسی ترجمه شده است
تشکر از استاد مهدی گنجی

The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire was translated into Polish in the spring of 2014 by Lidia Budziszewska, MSc, Universidad de Almeria, Spain; Stanislaw Malicki, MSc, Akershus University Hospital, Norway and Joanna Dudek, MSc, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poland.

The enclosed Polish translation, titled „Kwestionariusz Fuzji Poznawczej (KFP)”, is a consensus-version with an independent back-translation.

The Polish version of CFQ has yet to be validated, but it was already used in a cross-sectional study conducted by Stanislaw Malicki in 2014 on a mixed (clinical and non-clinical) sample of Polish adults (N=197). The Polish CFQ (KFP) was administered together with Polish versions of: Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II (AAQ-II), Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS – Brown & Ryan), Self-Compassion Scale – Short Form (Neff), Fears of Compassion Scales (Gilbert), Early Memories of Warmth Scale (Gilbert), Early Life Events Scale (Gilbert) and Relationships Questionnaire (Bartholomew & Horowitz). A summary document with correlational data will be available here soon.

For further information contact: Stanislaw Malicki, Akershus University Hospital, Norway; email: stanislaw.malicki@ahus.no

CFQ: Baran L., Hyla M., Kleszcz B. (2019). Elastyczność psychologiczna. Polska adaptacja narzędzi dla praktyków i badaczy. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. Read the book online at www.wydawnictwo.us.edu.pl/node/21733
See attachment CFQ Polish.

A team from Madrid developed and published a Spanish translation of the CFQ. Details of these studies can be seen here:
Romero-Moreno, R., Máquez-González, M., Losada, A. et al. (2012). Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire in dementia caregivers. The Gerontologist, 52, 54-55.
Romero-Moreno, R., Márquez-González, M., Losada, A., Gillanders, D. T.. & Fernández- Fernández, V. (2014). Cognitive fusion in dementia caregiving: psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Behavioral Psychology, 22, 1, 117-132.

Citations:

Ruiz, F.J., Suárez-Falcón, J.C., Cárdenas-Sierra, S. et al. (2016). Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II in Colombia. Psychol Rec, 66, 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0183-2

José Quintero, P.S., Rodríguez Biglieri, R., Etchezahar, & Gillanders, D. (2022). The Argentinian version of the cognitive fusion questionnaire: Psychometric properties and the role of cognitive fusion as a predictor of pathological worry. Curr Psychol, 41, 2546–2557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00767-4 The CFQ Argentinian version is in the appendix.

Logged in members can download the questionnaire and the validation article below.

Nilsson, P. (2021). Psykologisk Inflexibilitet och Kognitiv Fusion hos Vuxna med Autism, En Studie om Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Thesis: Mittuniversitetet/Mid Sweden University. Retrived from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1566478&dswid=1065
The CFQ-7 Swedish Version is in Appendix (Bilaga) 3.2.

Kervancioglu, A., Aydin, . Y., Sakarya, . D., Duymaz, . G. & Ozdel, . K. (2023) ADAPTATION OF COGNITIVE FUSION QUESTIONNAIRE TO TURKISH: A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 12 (1), 50-56. doi:10.5455/JCBPR.19971

Attached file with the name CFQ-turkish.pdf includes the Turkish version of the scale.

The Urdu translation of the CFQ is downloadable for ACBS-members. Translation and Validation of Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory is in process.

Rabia Khawar, Ph.D - rabiakhawar@gcuf.edu.pk
Associate Professor
Chairperson Department of Applied Psychology
GC University Faisalabad

Corresponding author: Paola Lucena-Santos, Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology.

E-mail: paolabc2.lucena@gmail.com

WhatsApp: +55 (51) 998055874

Affiliation: CINEICC - Cognitive Behavioral Research Center (Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra)

Address: Rua do Colégio Novo, Apartado 6153. Postal Code: 3001-802. Coimbra, Portugal.  

Reference:

Lucena-Santos, P., Trindade, I. A., Oliveira, M. S., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2017). Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire - Body Image: psychometric properties and its incremental power in the prediction of binge eating severity. The Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, doi: 10.1080/00223980.2017.1305322

Soltani, E., Izadi, S., Sharifi, P., & Poursadeghfard, M. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire-Chronic Illness in Multiple Sclerosis. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 16(1):e113524. DOI: 10.5812/ijpbs.113524.

Trindade, I. A., Ferreira, C., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2018). Assessment of chronic illness-related cognitive fusion: Preliminary development and validation of a new scale with an IBD sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. doi: 10.1007/s10880-017-9536-5

(original version in Portuguese from Portugal)

Pereira, I., Matos, A., & Azevedo, A. (2014). Portuguese version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire – Revised: Relation with depressive symptomatology in adolescents. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 15, 37-47. http://doi.org/10.15309/14psd150105 

CAO Ri-fang, CHENG Shu-lin, TANG Wen-xin, SONG Hai-dong (2001) The Reliability and Validity of Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2, 108.

Jia‐Yan Pan, Shengquan Ye, Petrus Ng (2015) Validation of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ) Among Mainland Chinese Students in Hong Kong. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72, 1, 38-48. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22193

Lichtenstein, M.B. et al (2019). A psychometric evaluation of the automatic thoughts questionnaire in Danish adolescents and emerging adults. Nordic Psychology, 71(4), 262-275. http://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2019.1604252

Boelen PA. (2007) Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire - Positive (ATQ - P). Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 36(1), 23-33. http://doi.org/10.1080/16506070600874315

Raes, F., & Hermans, D. (2011). De Nederlandstalige versie van de Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire-Revised (ATQ-R-NL) [The Dutch version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire-Revised (ATQ-R-NL)]. Gedragstherapie, 44(1), 53–62.

Lebreuilly, R. & Alsaleh, M. (2019) Élaboration d’un questionnaire court de pensées automatiques positives et négatives (ATQ-18-Fr) auprès d’étudiants français [Study to develop the positive and negative Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ-18-Fr) for French students]. Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive, 29(3), 132-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcc.2019.01.003

Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ)

Zettle, R. D. & Hayes, S. C. (1986). Dysfunctional control by client verbal behavior: The context of reason giving. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 30-38.

Traduzione Italiana (1.0) a cura di Melchiorri, E., Francesconi, C., Rossi, E., Ristè, N., Violini, P., Cioci, M. (2013). AISCC, Gruppo Ricerca ACT.

Traduzione Italiana (2.0) a cura di Melchiorri, E., Francesconi, C., Rossi, E., Ristè, N., Violini, P., Lijoi, E., Cioci, M. (2013) AISCC, Gruppo Ricerca ACT.

Traduzione Italiana (3.0) a cura di Melchiorri, E., Rossi, E., Violini, P., Ristè, N., Lijoi, E., (2014) AISCC, Gruppo Ricerca ACT.

Referenza bibliografica: Rossi, E., Melchiorri, E., Lijoi, E., Ristè, N., Violini, P., Panzera, A., (2014). A Preliminary Study on Validating the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ) in Italian Adolescents. Poster presented at ACBS World Conference 12 Poster Session - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - June 17-22, 2014.

Per informazioni: segreteria@aiscc.it – www.aiscc.it 

TANAKA, N., UJI, M., HIRAMURA, H., CHEN, Z., SHIKAI, N. and KITAMURA, T. (2006). Cognitive patterns and depression: Study of a Japanese university student population. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60, 358-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2006.01514.x

Oei, T. P. S.; Mukhtar, F. (2008) Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Validation and Psychometric Properties of the automatic Thoughts Questionnaire for Malays (ATQ-Malay) in Malaysia. Hong Kong Journal of Psychiatry, 18(3), 92-100.

Chioqueta, A. & Stiles, T. (2004). Norwegian version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: A reliability and validity study. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 33, 79-82. http://doi.org/10.1080/16506070310016031

Ghassemzadeh, H., Mojtabai, R., Karamghadiri, N., & Ebrahimkhani, N. (2006). Psychometric properties of a Persian-language version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: ATQ-Persian. The International journal of social psychiatry, 52(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764006062095

Ruiz, F., Suárez-Falcón, J., & Riaño-Hernández, D. (2017). Validity Evidence of the Spanish Version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire–8 in Colombia. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20, E12. http://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2017.7

Ruiz, F.J., Segura-Vargas M.A., Odriozola-González, P., & Suárez-Falcón J.C. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire-8 in two Spanish nonclinical samples. PeerJ, 8,e9747 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9747

Dr. Veera Balaji Kumar has shared his Tamil translation of ATQ. Therapists working with Tamil speaking clients can utilize this measure.

Proviso: Although this translation was cross-checked by a language expert and found workable in Veera's practice, it has not been psychometrically tested for accuracy.

Bozkurt, N , Aysan, F . (2013). GELİŞTİRİLMİŞ OTOMATİK DÜŞÜNCELER ÖLÇEĞI(ODÖ - G)'NİN LİSE ÖĞRENCİLERİ İÇİN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI . Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi , 12 (12) , 91-108 . 

Bougueffa, I. (2020) فعالية العلاج بالتقبل والإلتزام في التخفيف من أعراض الوسواس القهري [The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in relieving OCD symptoms]. Dissertation, University of Batna. The Believability of Anxious Feelings and Thoughts Questionnaire (BAFT) Arabic version is in the appendix. Retrieved from http://dspace.univ-batna.dz/handle/123456789/1210

Mohammadipour, M., Naghinasab Ardehaee, F. A (2016). Psychometric Indices of the Farsi Version of the Believability of Anxious Feelings and Thoughts Questionnaire (BAFT). Int J Ment Health Addiction 14, 752–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9624-4

Soltani E, Bahrainian , S A, Masjedi Arani A, Farhoudian A, Gachkar L. (2015) Psychometric properties of the Believability of Anxious Feelings and Thoughts Questionnaire (BAFT). pajoohande, 20 (5), 273-282.

Francisco J. Ruiz, Paula Odriozola-González, & Juan C. Suárez-Falcón (2014) The Spanish version of the Believability of Anxious Feelings and Thoughts Questionnaire. Psicothema, 26(3), 308-313. http://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.221 The Spanish Translation of the BAFT is in Table 1.

Aydın, G , Güneri, O . (2021). The Drexel Defusion Scale: Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 11(1) , 67-82. http://doi.org/10.19126/suje.770582

Al Awamleh, A. (2014) The effect of educational gymnastics skills on five facet mindfulness. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 14(2), 194 - 197. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2014.02030

Mazahreh, J. & Al Awamleh, A. (2016) The relationship between mindfulness, self compassion and the level of skill performance of gymnastics players. Sport Science, 9(2), 29‐33.

Mousa Ahamad, M., Saada, B., Alshamaileh, Q., Abusamra, M. & Al-Awamleh, A. (2018) The Level of Mindfulness, Hand-eye Coordination and Strength among Elite Fencers. Asian Social Science, 14(4), 65-69. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n4p65

Ebtsam Ahmed Mohamed, Safaa Mohammed Zaki, & Fatma Nagy Kotb (2021) Assessment of Mindfulness among Head Nurses, and its Effect on Staff Nurses’ Emotional Regulation and Quality of Work Life. Assiut Scientific Nursing Journal, 9(24), 153- 165. https://doi.org/10.21608/asnj.2021.58417.1103

Alispahic, S., & Hasanbegovic-Anic, E. (2017). Mindfulness: Age and gender differences on a Bosnian sample. Psychological Thought, 10(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v10i1.224 Retrieved from www.psycharchives.org/bitstream/20.500.12034/1497/1/psyct.v10i1.224.pdf
The FFMQ Bosnian version is in the appendix.

Hasanbegović-Anić, Enedina & Alispahic, Sabina & Tuce, Đenita & Čolić, Jasmin. (2017). Petofaktorski upitnik svjesne usredotočenosti: Provjera nekih metrijskih karakteristika na općoj populaciji/Five factor mindfulness questionnaire: examination of some metric characteristic in general population. 

Deng, YQ., Liu, XH., Rodriguez, M.A. et al. (2011) The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version. Mindfulness, 2, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0050-9

Hou, J., Wong, S. Y.-S., Lo, H. H.-M., Mak, W. W.-S., & Ma, H. S.-W. (2014). Validation of a Chinese Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Hong Kong and Development of a Short Form. Assessment, 21(3), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113485121

Huang, F.-Y., Wu, C.-W., Bhikshu, H.-M., Shih, G.-H., Chao, Y.-P., and Dai, C.-T. (2015). Validation of the Taiwanese Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (T-FFMQ). Psychological Testing, 62, 231–260. Retrieved from https://pt.ntcu.edu.tw/PQS/Home/doc?id=63

Meng, Y., Mao, K. & Li, C. (2020). Validation of a Short-Form Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Instrument in China. Front. Psychol., 10, 3031. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03031

Gračanin, A., Gunjača, V., Tkalčić, M., Kardum, I., Bajšanski, I. and Perak, B. (2017). The structure of focused awareness and its connection to personality traits and emotional response. Psychological Topics, 26 (3), 675-700. https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.26.3.9

Korinek, D. & Benda, J. & Žitník, J. (2019). Psychometrické charakteristiky krátké české verze Dotazníku pěti aspektů všímavosti (FFMQ-15-CZ). [Psychometric characteristics of the short Czech version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire] Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 63(1), 55-70.
Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331210436_Psychometricke_charakteristiky_kratke_ceske_verze_Dotazniku_peti_aspektu_vsimavosti_FFMQ-15-CZ
The Czech translation of the FFMQ-15 items is in the article.

Jensen, C. G., Krogh, S. C., Westphael, G., & Hjordt, L. V. (2019). Mindfulness is positively related to socioeconomic job status and income and independently predicts mental distress in a long-term perspective: Danish validation studies of the Five-Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 31(1), e1–e20. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000667

Veehof, M.M., ten Klooster, P.M., Taal, E. et al. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Dutch Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) in patients with fibromyalgia. Clin Rheumatol, 30, 1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-011-1690-9

Verhenne, Fanya (2010) Validiteit van de Five Facet Mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) bij mensen met fibromyalgie. Retrieved from http://essay.utwente.nl/60543/
The FFMQ Dutch Translation is in the appendix.

Teri Talpsep (2015) MEASURING MINDFULNESS AND SELF-COMPASSION: A QUESTIONNAIRE AND ERP STUDY. Master’s Thesis, University of Tartu. DOI: 10.1.1.824.992
The Estonian version of the FFMQ is in the Appendix.

Heeren, A., Douilliez, C., Peschard, V., Debrauwere, L., & Philippot, P. (2011). Cross-cultural consistency of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire: Adaptation and validation in a French sample. European Review of Applied Psychology, 61, 147-151

Abstract:
Introduction. – Recent research has revealed that mindfulness training improves mental health and psychological functioning. Although several questionnaires have been developed to measure mindfulness, the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), [Baer et al., 2006. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45] is currently one of the most empiricallybased scale assessing mindfulness.
Objective. – The present study was designed to: (1) test the psychometric properties and (2) explore the structural validation of the French version of the FFMQ.
Method. – Two hundred and fourteen participants were tested using the French version of the FFMQ.
Results. – Using confirmatory factor analysis, the results showed the French version of the FFMQ has good psychometric properties and a structural validity similar to the initial version.
Conclusion. – This adaptation constituted a validated mindfulness measure for French-speaking clinicians as well as researchers.
Keywords: Mindfulness, FFMQ, validation, French-speaking sample, self-report assessment, confirmatory factor analysis

Résumé
Introduction. Des recherches récentes indiquent que l’apprentissage de la pleine conscience améliore la santé mentale et le fonctionnement psychologique. Bien qu’une série de questionnaire ont été développés en vue de mesurer ce construit, le Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) (Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer, & Toney, 2006) est actuellement l’un des instruments empiriquement validés le plus utilisés pour mesurer la pleine conscience.
Objectifs. La présente étude a été élaborée en vue (1) de déterminer les propriétés psychométriques et (2) d’explorer la validité structurelle d’une adaptation francophone du FFMQ.
Méthode. Deux-cents quatorze participants ont complétés l’adaptation francophone du FFMQ.
Résultats. Au moyen d’analyses factorielles confirmatoires, les résultats indiquent que la version francophone du FFMQ présente de bonnes propriétés psychométriques et une validité structurale similaire à la version initiale.
Conclusion. La présente adaptation constitue une mesure valide d’évaluation de la pleine conscience utilisable tant pour le clinicien que le chercheur francophone.
Mots-clés: Pleine conscience, FFMQ, validation, échantillon francophone, questionnaire, analyse factorielle confirmatoire

Michalak, J. et al. (2016). Erfassung von Achtsamkeit mit der deutschen Version des Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaires (FFMQ-D). Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 24(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149/a000149 FFMQ German Translation is in Tabelle 2. 

HAGIT AARONSOHN (2012) META-MIND VS. META- EMOTION: THE IMPACT OF MINDFULNESS MEDITATION PRACTICE ON EMOTIONAL PROCESSING AND EMOTIONAL SCHEMAS. THESIS: BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV.
Retrieved from http://aranne5.bgu.ac.il/others/AaronsohnHagit.pdf
The FFMQ Hebrew Translation is in the Appendix Page XLIX. 

Józsa L. Az Ötfaktoros Jelentudatosság Kérdőív (FFMQ) adaptálása magyar mintán. In: Rózsa S, Kálmán R, Kő N, Nagy H, Fiáth T, Magi A, Eisinger A, Oláh A. Az érzelmi arcfelismerés jelentősége és mérése a pszichológiai kutatásokban: Az Ekman-féle érzelmi detekció teszttel szerzett hazai tapasztalatok. Pszichológia, 2012; 32, 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1556/pszicho.32.2012.3.4

Frostadottir, A.D. & Dorjee, D. (2019). Effects of Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) and Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT) on Symptom Change, Mindfulness, Self-Compassion, and Rumination in Clients With Depression, Anxiety, and Stress. Frontiers in Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01099

Giovannini, C., Giromini, L., Bonalume, L. et al. (2014). The Italian Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: A Contribution to its Validity and Reliability. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36, 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9403-0

Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) is a measure of mindfulness that holds an important position in ACT. Many measurement scales for mindfulness have been published in recent years, but FFMQ is the result of joint factor analysis.
The Japanese version of FFMQ has a five-factor structure (observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging, nonreactivity).

Sugiura, Y., Sato, A., Ito, Y., Murakami, H. (2012). Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3, 85-94.

Takahashi, T., Saito, J., Fujino, M., Sato, M., & Kumano, H. (2022). The Validity and Reliability of the Short Form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Japan. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 833381. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833381

The FFMQ Japanese version is on the ACBS Japan Chapter website.

Choi, S-Y.(2015). Study on Validity and Reliability of Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) for Measuring Mindfulness Meditation Program Before and After. Journal of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, 26 (2). http://doi.org/10.7231/jon.2015.26.2.181
 

Majors, Māris (2013). APZINĀTĪBAS PIECU ASPEKTU APTAUJAS (The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionarie (FFMQ)) ADAPTĀCIJA. Master's thesis. https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/42253

Dundas, I., Vøllestad, J., Binder, P. E., & Sivertsen, B. (2013). The Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire in Norway. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 54(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12044

TAMANNAEIFAR, S., & ASGHARNEJADE FARID, A., & MIRZAEE, M., & SOLEIMANI, M. (2016). PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF FIVE FACTOR MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (JOURNAL OF IRANIAN PSYCHOLOGISTS), 12(47), 321-329.

Radoń, S. (2014). Validation of the Polish adaptation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Annals of Psychology, 17 (4), 737-760.

Víviam Vargas de Barros, Elisa Harumi Kozasa, Isabel Cristina Weiss de Souza, Telmo Mota Ronzani (2014) Validity evidence of the brazilian version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ). Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 30 (3). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722014000300009

Alexandre Ramos, António Rosado, Sidónio Serpa, Adolfo Cangas, José Gallego, Luís Ramos (2018). Validity evidence of the portuguese version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 27(2), 87–98. Available at: https://archives.rpd-online.com/article/view/v27-n2-carvalho-ramos-rosado-etal.html

Elena Druică & Rodica Ianole (2018). Simply Clustering. Making New Sense In The Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire. Romanian Statistical Review, nr. 1.

Golubev, A. M. & Dorosheva, E. A. (2018) Особенности применения русскоязычной версии пятифакторного опросника осознанности. [Features of the Russian-language version of the five-factor questionnaire of awareness}. Сибирский психологический журнал, 69,46–68.

Baminiwatta, A., Alahakoon, H., Herath, N.C. et al. (2022). Psychometric Evaluation of a Sinhalese Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and Development of a Six-Facet Short Form in a Sri Lankan Buddhist Context. Mindfulness 13, 1069–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01863-1

Outschoorn, N.O., Herath, H. & Amarasuriya, S.D. (2021) SINHALA VERSION OF THE FIVE FACET MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE (FFMQ-39-SIN): CONTENT VALIDATION THROUGH EXPERT JUDGEMENT AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY. Proceeding of the Open University Research Sessions. Retrieved from https://ours.ou.ac.lk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ID-134_SINHALA-VERSION-OF-THE-FIVE-FACET-MINDFULNESS-QUESTIONNAIRE-FFMQ-39-SIN-CONTENT-VALIDATION-THROUGH-EXPERT-JUDGEMENT-AND-INTERNAL-CONSISTENCY.pdf
 

Látalová, Veronika & Pilárik, Ľubor. (2014). Overenie psychometrických vlastností a faktorovej štruktúry slovenskej verzie dotazníka FFMQ (five–facet mindfulness questionnaire) [The evaluation of the psychometric properties and the factor structure of the slovak version of the questionnaire FFMQ (five-facet mindfulness questionnaire)]. Psychologie a její kontexty, 5(2), 81–99. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267506585

Feliu-Soler, A., Pérez-Aranda, A., Luciano, J. V., Demarzo, M., Mariño, M., Soler, J., Van Gordon, W., García-Campayo, J., & Montero-Marín, J. (2021). Psychometric properties of the 15-item five facet mindfulness questionnaire in a large sample of spanish pilgrims. Mindfulness, 12(4), 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01549-6

Asensio-Martínez Á, Masluk B, Montero-Marin J, Olivan-Blázquez B, Navarro-Gil MT, García-Campayo J, et al. (2019) Validation of Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire – Short form, in Spanish, general health care services patients sample: Prediction of depression through mindfulness scale. PLoS ONE,14(4), e0214503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214503

Aguado, J., Luciano, J.V., Cebolla, A., Serrano-Blanco, A., Soler, J. & García-Campayo, J. (2015). Bifactor analysis and construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) in non-clinical Spanish samples. Front. Psychol., 6, 404. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00404

Cebolla, A., García-Palacios, A., Soler, J., Guillen, V., Baños, R. Botella, C. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Spanish validation of the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). Eur. J. Psychiat., 26(2), 118-126. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S0213-61632012000200005

Josefine L. Lilja, Annika Frodi-Lundgren, Jan Johansson Hanse, Torbjörn Josefsson, Lars-Gunnar Lundh, Camilla Sköld, Erling Hansen & Anders G. Broberg (2011) Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire—Reliability and Factor Structure: A Swedish Version. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 40(4), 291-303. DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2011.580367

Handan Deniz Ayalp & Nesrin Hisli Şahin (2018) Beş Faktörlü Bilgece Farkındalık Ölçeği-Kısa Formu’nun (BFBFÖ-K) Türkçe Uyarlaması [Turkish adaptation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire - Short Form (FFMQ-S)]. Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 2018, Issue 3,  117-127.

Fatoş Kınay (2013)  BEŞ BOYUTLU BİLİNÇLİ FARKINDALIK ÖLÇEĞİ’Nİ TÜRKÇE’YE UYARLAMA, GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI. İSTANBUL BİLİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ, Master's Thesis.

Kaplunenko, Y. & Kuchyna, V. (2022). АДАПТАЦІЯ ТА ВАЛІДИЗАЦІЯ ПʼЯТИФАКТОРНОГО ОПИТУВАЛЬНИКА МАЙНДФУЛНЕС (ПОМ-39) [ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF FIVE FACTOR MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE]. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 1(33). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30032022/7795 The FFMQ Ukrainian version is in the appendix.

Sayyeda Taskeen Zahra & Saima Riaz (2017) MEDIATING ROLE OF MINDFULNESS IN STRESSRESILIENCE RELATIONSHIP AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Pakistan Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 21-32.

Nguyen, H.T.M., Nguyen, H.V. & Bui, T.T.H. (2022). The psychometric properties of the Vietnamese Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. BMC Psychology, 10, 300. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-01003-3

Zeinab Bitar, Feten Fekih Romdhane, Radoslaw Rogoza, Hossam M. Ghorab, Sahar Obeid & Souheil Hallit (2023 in press) Psychometric properties of the short form of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory in the Arabic language, International Journal of Environmental Health Research. DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2023.2267483

Bougueffa, I. (2020) فعالية العلاج بالتقبل والإلتزام في التخفيف من أعراض الوسواس القهري [The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in relieving OCD symptoms]. Dissertation, University of Batna. The Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI) Arabic version is in the appendix. Retrieved from http://dspace.univ-batna.dz/handle/123456789/1210

Hirayama, M.S. (2014) Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory: adaptação cultural e validação para a língua portuguesa no Brasil. [Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory : cross-cultural adaptation and validation to Portuguese in Brasil] Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Campinas, SP. Disponível em: http://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/283892

Hirayama, M.S. et al (2014) A percepção de comportamentos relacionados à atenção plena e a versão brasileira do Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory. [The perception of behavior related to mindfulness and the Brazilian version of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory]. Ciênc. saúde coletiva 19 (9). https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232014199.12272013 The Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory adapted for Brazil (FMI-Br) is in Quadro 2.

Chen, S.Y., & Zhou, R.L. (2014). Validation of a Chinese Version of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory–Short Version. Mindfulness, 5, 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0208-8

Jensen, C. G., Niclasen, J., Vangkilde, S. A., Petersen, A., & Hasselbalch, S. G. (2016). General inattentiveness is a long-term reliable trait independently predictive of psychological health: Danish validation studies of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), e70–e87. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000196

Bruggeman-Everts, F. Z., Van der Lee, M. L., Van ‘t Hooft, E. F. M., & Nyklíček, I. (2017). Validation of the Dutch Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory in Patients With Medical Illness. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017705936  The FMI Dutch translation is in the Supplemental Material.

Trousselard, M., Steiler, D., Raphel, C. et al. (2010) Validation of a French version of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory - short version: relationships between mindfulness and stress in an adult population. BioPsychoSocial Med, 4, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-4-8 The FMI French Translation is in the Electronic supplementary material.

Heidenreich, T., Ströhle, G., & Michalak, J. (2006). Achtsamkeit: Konzeptuelle aspekte und ergebnisse zum Freiburger achtsam-keitsfragebogen [Conceptual aspects and results of the Freiburg mindfulness questionnaire]. Verhaltenstherapie, 16(1), 33-40. http://doi.org/10.1159/000091521

Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI)

Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness - the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543-1555.

Traduzione Italiana (1.0) a cura di Cioci, M., Rossi, E., Violini, P., Francesconi, C., Ristè, N., Melchiorri, E. (2013) AISCC, Gruppo Ricerca ACT.

Traduzione Italiana (2.0) a cura di Rossi, E., Melchiorri, E., Lijoi, E., Ristè, N., Violini, P., (2014) AISCC, Gruppo Ricerca ACT.

Referenza bibliografica: Violini, P., Ristè, N., Lijoi, E., Melchiorri, E., Rossi, E., Panzera, A.,(2014). The preliminary psychometric properties of an Italian version of Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI) for Adolescents. Poster presented at ACBS World Conference 12 Poster Session - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - June 17-22, 2014

Per informazioni: segreteria@aiscc.it – www.aiscc.it 

Ghasemi Jobaneh R, Arab Zadeh M, Jalili Nikoo S, Mohammad Alipoor Z, & Mohsenzadeh F. (2015). بررسی روایی و پایایی نسخه فارسی فرم کوتاه پرسشنامه ذهن‌آگاهی فرایبورگ. [Survey the validity and reliability of the persian version of short form of freiburg mindfulness inventory.] Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Science, 14(2), 137- 50. http://eprints.rums.ac.ir/5689/

Baran L., Hyla M., Kleszcz B. (2019). Elastyczność psychologiczna. Polska adaptacja narzędzi dla praktyków i badaczy. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. Read the book online at www.wydawnictwo.us.edu.pl/node/21733
See attachment for Polish FMI.

Pérez-Verduzco, G., & Laca-Arocena, F. A. (2017). Traducción y validación de la versión abreviada del Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI-14). Revista Evaluar, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v17.n1.17076

Arocena, Francisco & Pérez-Verduzco, Germán & Valencia, Angel. (2016). Multivariate Analysis of the Spanish Version of the FMI-14: Contributions From the Item Response Theory and Biplot Methods. PAPIREX Indian Journal of Research, 5, 242-245. 

Hasan Turan Karatepe & Kaasım Fatih Yavuz (2019) Reliability, validity, and factorial structure of the Turkish version of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (Turkish FMI). Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(4), 472-478. http://doi.org/10.1080/24750573.2019.1663582

Сахнюк Роксолана Володимирівна (2021). Психометричні властивості української версії Фрайбурзького опитувальника майндфулнес на вибірці повнолітнього. Магістерська робота, Український католицький університет. [Sakhniuk R.V. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Ukrainian version of Freiburg Mindfulness questionnaire on a sample of adults. Master's thesis, Ukrainian Catholic University.] The FMI Ukrainian version is in the appendix. http://www.er.ucu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/1/2763/Sakhniuk_mag.pdf

Aldahadha, B. (2013). The effects of Muslim praying meditation and transcendental meditation programs on mindfulness among the University of Nizwa students. College Student Journal, 47, 668-676.

Xin Xu, Daxing Wu, Xiaohua Zhao, Junxiang Chen, Jie Xia, Mulei Li, Xueqing Nie & Xue Zhong (2016) Relation of perceptions of educational environment with mindfulness among Chinese medical students: a longitudinal study. Medical Education Online, 21(1). DOI: 10.3402/meo.v21.30664

Dekeyser, M., Raes, F., Leijssen, M., Leysen, S., & Dewulf, D. (2008) Mindfulness skills and interpersonal behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1235-1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.018

Nicastro, R., Jermann, F., Bondolfi, G., & McQuillan, A. (2010). Assessment of Mindfulness With the French Version of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills in Community and Borderline Personality Disorder Samples. Assessment, 17(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110363551

Ströhle, G., Nachtigall, C., Michalak, J., Heidenreich, T. (2010). Die Erfassung von Achtsamkeit als mehrdimensionales Konstrukt: Die deutsche Version des Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS-D) [Measuring mindfulness as a multidimensional construct: German version of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS-D)]. Zeitschrift Für Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie, 39(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000001

Psarraki, E.E. et al. (2021). The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills in Greek Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. In: Vlamos, P. (eds) GeNeDis 2020. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1339. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78787-5_28

Kim Jong-mo. (2006). 한국판 켄터키 마음챙김기술 척도의 타당화 연구 [A Validation Study of Korean Version of Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills]. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 4, 1123-1139.

DEHGHAN MANSHADI ZOBEYDEH et al (2012) PSYCHOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE KENTUCKY INVENTORY OF MINDFULNESS SKILLS.  JOURNAL OF THOUGHT & BEHAVIOR IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 7(25), 27 - 36. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=372692

Černetič Mihael (2016) The relationship between anxiety and mindfulness: The role of mindfulness facets, implicit anxiety, and the problem of measuring anxiety by self-report. Psihologija, 49(2), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1602169C

Ruiz, F. J. (2014). The relationship between low levels of mindfulness skills and pathological worry: The mediating role of psychological inflexibility. [La relación entre habilidades de mindfulness y preocupación patológica: El rol mediador de la inflexibilidad psicológica]. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 887–897. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.150651

Erling Hansen, Lars‐Gunnar Lundh, Anders Homman & Margit Wångby‐Lundh (2009). Measuring Mindfulness: Pilot Studies with the Swedish Versions of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(1), 2-15. http://doi.org/10.1080/16506070802383230

Olarza, A., Soroa, G., Aritzeta, A. et al. (2023 in press). Basque Adaptation of the Reduced Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS-R). Mindfulness. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02241-1

Marei S. Younes &  Mohammed R. Alzahrani (2018) Could Resilience and Flourishing be Mediators in the Relationship between Mindfulness and Life Satisfaction for Saudi College Students? A Psychometric and Exploratory Study. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 12(4), 708-723. https://doi.org/10.24200/jeps.vol12iss4pp708-723

Black, D. S., Sussman, S., Johnson, C. A., & Milam, J. (2012). Psychometric Assessment of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) Among Chinese Adolescents. Assessment, 19(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111415365

Deng, YQ., Li, S., Tang, YY. et al. (2012) Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Translation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Mindfulness 3, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0074-1

Chen, S., Cui, H., Zhou, R., and Jia, Y. (2012). Revision and reliability and validity of the Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MASS). Chin. J. Clin. Psych. 20, 148–151. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2012.02.024

Jensen, C. G., Niclasen, J., Vangkilde, S. A., Petersen, A., & Hasselbalch, S. G. (2016). General inattentiveness is a long-term reliable trait independently predictive of psychological health: Danish validation studies of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), e70–e87. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000196

de Bruin, E.I., Zijlstra, B.J.H., van de Weijer-Bergsma, E. et al. (2011) The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale for Adolescents (MAAS-A): Psychometric Properties in a Dutch Sample. Mindfulness, 2, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0061-6

Seema, R., Quaglia, J.T., Brown, K.W. et al. (2015) The Estonian Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: Assessing Mindfulness Without a Distinct Linguistic Present Tense. Mindfulness, 6, 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0314-2

Suvi Naukkarinen, Petri Karkkola, Matti Kuittinen & Hannu Räty (2016). Suomenkielisen MAAS-mittarin psykometrinen rakenne ja yhteydet persoonallisuuspiirteisiin sekä hyvinvointiin. PSYKOLOGIA, 51 (05).
 

Jermann, F., Billieux, J., Larøi, F., d'Argembeau, A., Bondolfi, G., Zermatten, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2009). Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS): Psychometric properties of the French translation and exploration of its relations with emotion regulation strategies. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 506–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017032

Adaptation de "Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale" de Brown & Ryan (2003) inclus dans le livre de "ACT for anxiety disorders" de Eifert & Forsyth (2005). Le questionnaire est accessible en devenant membre d'ACT. Cette version française du questionnaire n'a pas été validée et il est le résultat d'une adaptation personnelle. Il n'a donc pas passé par toutes les étapes de traductions habituelles. Je l'utilise comme moyen d'orienter plus précisément la thérapie ou comme outil thérapeutique. Il ne peut donc pas être utilisé dans le cadre de recherche scientifique. Login to your ACBS account to see the attachment.

Michalak, J. & Heidenreich, T. & Ströhle, G. (2008). Die deutsche Version der Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) Psychometrische Befunde zu einem Achtsamkeitsfragebogen. Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie - Z KLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOTHERY, 37, 200-208. http://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443.37.3.200 

Mantzios, M., Wilson, J.C. & Giannou, K. (2015) Psychometric Properties of the Greek Versions of the Self-Compassion and Mindful Attention and Awareness Scales. Mindfulness, 6, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0237-3

Simor, P., Petke, Z., & Köteles, F. (2013) Measuring pre-reflexive consciousness: The Hungarian validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Learning & Perception, Volume 5, Issue Supplement-2. https://doi.org/10.1556/lp.5.2013.suppl2.2
 

Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848.

Traduzione Italiana (2.0) a cura di Lijoi, E., Ristè, N., Melchiorri, E., Rossi, E., Violini, P., Violini, P., (2014) AISCC, Gruppo Ricerca ACT.

Rabitti, E., Miselli, G., and Moderato, P. (2013). Misurare la capacità di restare in contatto con il momento presente: la validazione italiana della mindful attention awareness scale. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 19, 323-339.

Referenza bibliografica: Violini, P., Lijoi, E., Ristè, N., Rossi, E., Melchiorri, E., Panzera, A., (2014). Reliability and Validity of an Italian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) for Youth. Poster presented at ACBS World Conference 12 Poster Session - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - June 17-22, 2014. 

Per informazioni: segreteria@aiscc.it – www.aiscc.it 

Masahiro Fujino, Shogo Kajimura, Michio Nomura (2015) Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale Using Item Response Theory Analysis. The Japanese Journal of Personality, 24(1), 61-76.  https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.24.61

Kwon Sun-joung, Kim Kyung-heon. (2007) 한국판 마음챙김 주의 알아차림 척도 (K-MAAS)의 타당화 연구 [Validation of the Korean Version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (K-MAAS)]. Journal of Korean Psychology: Health, 12, 1, 269-287.

Phang, C.-K., Mukhtar, F., Ibrahim, N. & Mohd. Sidik, S. (2016). Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS): factorial validity and psychometric properties in a sample of medical students in Malaysia. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 11(5), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-02-2015-0011

Zainal, N.Z., Nor-Aziyan, Y., & Subramaniam P. (2015) Psychometric properties of the Malay-translated Mindfulness, Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) in a group of nursing students in Malaysia. Malaysian J Psychiatry, 24(1). https://www.mjpsychiatry.org/index.php/mjp/article/view/352

Radoń, S. (2014). Walidacja Skali Świadomej Obecności [VALIDATION OF THE POLISH VERSION OF MINDFUL ATTENTION AWARENESS SCALE]. Studia Psychologica: Theoria et praxis, 14(1), 50-69.

Gregório, S., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2013). Mindful attention and awareness: Relationships with psychopathology and emotion regulation. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1-10. http://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.79 

The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) Serbian Translation can be found on the Repository of psychological instruments in Serbian [Repozitorijum psiholoških instrumenata na srpskom jeziku] (REPOPSI). http://mfr.de-1.osf.io/render?url=https://osf.io/46gq5/?direct%26mode=render%26action=download%26mode=render
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5ZB8P

Černetič Mihael (2016). The relationship between anxiety and mindfulness: The role of mindfulness facets, implicit anxiety, and the problem of measuring anxiety by self-report. Psihologija, 49(2), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1602169C

Soler, J., Tejedor, R., Feliu-Soler, A., Pascual, J.C, Cebolla, A., Álvarez, E., & Pérez, V. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la escala Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) [Psychometric properties of the Spanish versión of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)]. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 40, 18-25.

Barajas, S. & Garra, L. (2014). Mindfulness and psychopathology: Adaptation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in a Spanish sample. Mindfulness y psicopatología: adaptación de la escala de conciencia y atención plena (MAAS) en una muestra española. Clínica y Salud, 1, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1130-5274(14)70026-X  The Spanish MAAS translation is in the Appendix.

Erling Hansen, Lars‐Gunnar Lundh, Anders Homman & Margit Wångby‐Lundh (2009). Measuring Mindfulness: Pilot Studies with the Swedish Versions of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(1), 2-15. http://doi.org/10.1080/16506070802383230

Catak, P.D. (2012). The Turkish Version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: Preliminary Findings. Mindfulness, 3, 1–9. https://doi/org/10.1007/s12671-011-0072-3 The MAAS Turkish Translation is in Table 2.

Amna Ajmal & Syeda Shahida Batool (2020) Psychometric Properties of the Urdu Translation of Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in Pakistan. SJESR, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol3-iss2-2020(190-197)

Silveira, A., Gomes de Castro, T. & Gomes, W. (2012). Adaptation and validation of the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale among Brazilian adults. Psico-USF, 17, 215-223. http:doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712012000200005

Zeng, X., Li, M., Zhang, B., & Liu, X. (2015). Revision of the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale for measuring awareness and equanimity in Goenka's Vipassana meditation with Chinese Buddhists. Journal of religion and health, 54(2), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9870-y

LIANG, Y., LIU, H., ZHOU, H., WANG, D. & DENG, Y. (2018). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of philadelphia mindfulness scale in college students. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science, 27(9), 843-847.

Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS)

Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: The Philadelphia mindfulness scale. Assessment, 15, 204-223.

Traduzione Italiana (1.0) a cura di Ristè, N., Violini, P., Melchiorri, E., Lijoi, E., Rossi, E.,(2014) AISCC, Gruppo Ricerca ACT.

Referenza bibliografica: Melchiorri, E.,Rossi, E., Violini, P., Ristè, N., Lijoi, E., Panzera, A., (2014). Validation of the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) for the Italian youth population. Poster presented at ACBS World Conference 12 Poster Session - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - June 17-22, 2014

Per informazioni: segreteria@aiscc.it – www.aiscc.it 

Tom Østergaard, Tobias Lundgren, Robert D. Zettle, Nils Inge Landrø, & Vegard Øksendal Haaland (2020) Psychological Flexibility in Depression Relapse Prevention: Processes of Change and Positive Mental Health in Group-Based ACT for Residual Symptoms. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00528

Ameri, S. & Kooshki, S. (2021). Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) in Students. Islamic Life Style, 5(1), 1-10. URL: http://islamiclifej.com/article-1-391-en.html

Farzin Rad, B., Rashidian, M., Shakeri Juybari, Z., & Dehghani Ashkezari, E. (2022). Investigating the Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) among Clients of Counseling and Psychotherapy Centers. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 13(1), 345-362. DOI: 10.22059/japr.2022.319635.643768

Černetič Mihael (2016). The relationship between anxiety and mindfulness: The role of mindfulness facets, implicit anxiety, and the problem of measuring anxiety by self-report. Psihologija, 49(2), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1602169C

Tejedor, R. et al. (2014). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale [Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale] Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, 7 (4), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsmen.2014.10.002

Silpakit, Chatchawan & Silpakit, Orawan & Wisajun, Pattaraphorn. (2011). The validity of Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale Thai version. Journal of Mental Health of Thailand, 19(3), 140-147. Retrived from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmht/article/view/968
The PHLMS Thai version is in the article. 

Çelik, H , Onat Kocabıyık, O . (2018). Philadelphia Farkındalık Ölçeği (PFÖ)’nin Türkçe Formunun Psikometrik Özellikleri [The Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS): Cultural Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the PMS]. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 48 (48). DOI: 10.15285/maruaebd.345925 The Turkish PMLMS items are in table 2 and table 3.

Cao, H. et al (2021) Chinese validation of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) in college students. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 19, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.01.004 The BEAQ translation in Simplified Chinese is in the Appendix.

Lo, H.H.M., Powell, C.L.Y.M., Chan, S.H.W. et al. (2023). Validating an Adapted Version of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire in Hong Kong Chinese. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 45, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10020-w

Petříková, K. (2021). Atributy acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) v kontextu syndromu vyhoření u studentů medicíny. Thesis: Masarykova Univerzita. Retrieved from https://is.muni.cz/th/ww25y/ The Czech version of BEAQ is in the Appendix.

References:

Schaeuffele, C., Knaevelsrud, C., Renneberg, B., & Boettcher, J. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the German Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ). Assessment, 29(7), 1406-1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211010955

SAKAGUCHI, R., SEGUCHI, A., &  MITAMURA, T. (2023). 日本語版 Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire BEAQ) の開発 [Developing the Japanese version of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire]. RITSUMEIKAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES, 47, 1-11.

Lee Ju-Yeon, You Sung-Eun (2017) 한국판 다차원적 경험회피 척도(K-MEAQ)의 타당화 및 단축형(K-MEAQ-24) 개발 [Validation of the Korean Version of the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire(K-MEAQ) and Development of a Brief Form(K-MEAQ-24)].  Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Korea, 17, 2, 181 - 208.

Vázquez-Morejón, R. et al. (2019). Validation of a Spanish version of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) in clinical population. Psicothema, 31(3), 335-340. DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2019.60

The BEAQ in Spanish and English are included in the appendix of this article.

Chen, Y., Luo, H., Wang, S., Bai, X., & Zhu, Z. (2023). Preliminary validation of a Chinese version of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes. Current Psychology, 42, 15528–15538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02654-y

Ptáček, M., & Jelínek, M. (2024). Assessing psychological flexibility: The psychometric properties of the Czech translation of the CompACT questionnaire. Československá psychologie, 68(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.68.1.30 The CompACT Czech version is available on Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/cwjxq/

Giovannetti, A. M., Pöttgen, J., Anglada, E., Menéndez, R., Hoyer, J., Giordano, A., Pakenham, K. I., et al. (2022). Cross-Country Adaptation of a Psychological Flexibility Measure: The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3150. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063150

Giovannetti, A.M., Rosato, R., Galán, I. et al. (2024). Cross-cultural validity and reliability of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) in people with multiple sclerosis. Quality of Life Research, 33, 1359–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03609-z

Gitta Annisa Vania Suganda & Fitri Ariyanti Abidin (2022). The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Treatment Process (Compact): Adaptation of The Indonesian Version. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 11(3). Retrieved from www.researchgate.net

Giovannetti, A. M., Pöttgen, J., Anglada, E., Menéndez, R., Hoyer, J., Giordano, A., Pakenham, K. I., et al. (2022). Cross-Country Adaptation of a Psychological Flexibility Measure: The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3150. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063150<

Giovannetti, A.M., Rosato, R., Galán, I. et al. (2024). Cross-cultural validity and reliability of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) in people with multiple sclerosis. Quality of Life Research, 33, 1359–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03609-z

Musa, N., Pang, N.T.P., Kamu, A., Ho, C.M., Waters, C., Berrett, J., Moghaddam, N., & Wider, W. (2022). The Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT)—Malay Version. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9624. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159624

References:

Hajloo, N., Pourabdol, S., Sobhi-Gharamaleki, N., & Beyki, M. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT). Qom University of Medical Science Journal, 15(11). URL: http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-3352-en.html

Soleimani, Z., Shairi, M. (2022). Examination of validity and reliability of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (COMPACT) in non-clinical iranian sampels. Clinical Psychology and Personality, 19(2), 121-137. http://doi.org/10.22070/cpap.2021.3077

Dudek, J., Cyniak-Cieciura, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2024 in press) Psychometric properties of the Polish version of The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT) Psychiatria Polska.

References

Inês A. Trindade, Nuno B. Ferreira, Ana Laura Mendes, Cláudia Ferreira, Dave Dawson, & Nima Golijani-Moghaddam (2021). Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT): Measure refinement and study of measurement invariance across Portuguese and UK samples. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 21, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.05.002

Inês A.Trindade, Paula Vagos, Helena Moreira, Daniela V.Fernandes, & IanTyndall (2022). Further validation of the 18-item Portuguese CompACT scale using a multi-sample design: Confirmatory factor analysis and correlates of psychological flexibility. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 25, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.06.003

Călinici, M. S., & Călinici, T. (2021). COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF ACT PROCESSES COMPACT. ROMANIAN ADAPTATION AND SHORT FORM VALIDATION. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 21(2). DOI: 10.24193/jebp.2021.2.19

Submitted by Simona Calinici on January 23, 2021

Completați cu scoruri de la 0 la 6, în funcție de cât de bine vi se potrivesc următoarele afirmații ( 0= deloc, 6= maxim)
1. Pot identifica lucrurile care contează în viață pentru mine și să le urmăresc.
2 r. Unul dintre cele mai importante scopuri ale mele este a evita amintirile dureroase.
3. r Desfășor activități semnificative fără să fiu cu adevărat atent la ele.
4r .Încerc să fiu mereu ocupat ca să nu-mi vină gânduri sau emoții în minte.
5. Acționez în concordanță cu felul cum doresc să-mi desfășor viața.
6r.Sunt atât de prins în gândurile mele că nu pot să fac nici lucrurile pe care doresc cel mai mult să le fac.
7. Fac alegeri în funcție de ce este important pentru mine, chiar dacă este stresant.
8 r Îmi spun că n-ar trebui să am anumite gânduri.
9.r Îmi este greu să rămân concentrat pe ceea ce se întamplă în prezent.
10. Mă comport conform valorilor mele.
11.r Evit situațiile care mi-ar putea produce gânduri, emoții sau senzații neplăcute.
12. r Chiar și când fac lucruri care contează pentru mine, îmi dau seama că le fac fără să fiu atent la ele.
13. Sunt dispus să trăiesc orice gânduri, emoții sau senzații se ivesc, fără să încerc să le schimb sau să mă apăr de ele.
14. Întreprind lucruri care au semnificație pentru mine, chiar dacă mi-e greu.
15.r Mă străduiesc mult să țin la distanță sentimentele supărătoare.
16. r Fac lucruri și sarcini automat, fără să-mi dau seama când le fac.
17. Pot să-mi urmez planurile pe termen lung chiar și atunci când progresul este lent.
18.r Nu fac ceva, chiar dacă e important pentru mine, dacă există riscul de a suferi.
19.r Se pare că funcționez pe pilot automat, fără prea multă atenție la ce fac.
20. Gândurile sunt doar gânduri, ele nu controlează ce fac eu.
21.Valorile mele se reflectă cu adevarat în acțiunile mele (în comportamentul meu).
22. Pot să iau gândurile și emoțiile așa cum vin , fără să încerc să le controlez sau evit.
23. Pot să perseverez în ceva, dacă e important pentru mine.

Traducere și adaptare pentru populația românească Simona Călinici (UMF Iuliu Hațieganu Cluj Napoca, simona.calinici@gmail.com)

Salvador Reyes-Martín; Mónica Hernández-López; Miguel Rodríguez-Valverde (2021) Spanish adaptation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT). Poster presented at ACBS Annual World Conference 19.

Giovannetti, A. M., Pöttgen, J., Anglada, E., Menéndez, R., Hoyer, J., Giordano, A., Pakenham, K. I., et al. (2022). Cross-Country Adaptation of a Psychological Flexibility Measure: The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3150. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063150<

Giovannetti, A.M., Rosato, R., Galán, I. et al. (2024). Cross-cultural validity and reliability of the comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) in people with multiple sclerosis. Quality of Life Research, 33, 1359–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03609-z

Marie-Louise Möllerberg, Graciela Rovner, Jeanette Melin, & Magnus Johansson. (2021, June 11). CompACT-23 questionnaire, Swedish translation. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4925832

The Swedish translation is described and available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4925832

The original Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT) has been tranlsated into Tamil language and is in the process of validation. Researchers can help in the process of assessing the psychometric properties of the translated version. 

A short-form multidimensional measure of psychological flexibility components, including openness to experiences, behavioral awareness, and valued action subscales. Attached is the scale and an Excel coding sheet for ease of use.

Hsu, T., Hoffman, L., & Thomas, E. B. K. (2023). Confirmatory measurement modeling and longitudinal invariance of the CompACT-15: A short-form assessment of psychological flexibility. Psychological Assessment, 35(5), 430–442. DOI: 10.1037/pas0001214

Here is a link to the publicly available manuscript: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101904/

The manuscript reports on CFA and IFA latent variable measurement models that supported a 15-item short-form. The three-factor structure demonstrated good fit. Acceptable reliability was observed across the three factors. Moreover, the results indicated measurement equivalence of the items to assess latent change over time. Construct validity was also demonstrated. 

Many thanks to the CompACT's authors (Ashley W. Francis, David L. Dawson, & Nima Golijani-Moghaddam) for their willingness to allow us to use the scale's items in this work! 

Batink, T., & Delespaul, P. (2015). Meten van psychologische flexibiliteit – De Flexiibiliteits Index Test (FIT-60). Tijdschrift voor Gedragstherapie, 48(4), 310-332.

Batink, T., Jansen, G. & De Mey, H.R.A. (2012). De Flexibiliteits Index Test (FIT-60): Een beknopte beschrijving. GZ-Psychologie, 5, 18-21.

The Flexibility Index Test (FIT-60) Dutch version is here https://www.actinactie.nl/flexibiliteits-index-test-fit-60/

Jansen, S., Klundert, N. van de, & Rinia, K. (2016) De drijfveren van experiëntiële vermijding: het verband tussen experiëntiële vermijding, regulatiefocus en actie-oriëntatie [The drivers of experiential avoidance}. Universiteit Utrecht, Thesis. The Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (Nederlandse vertaling) is in Appendix C.

Jung, J.-H. (2018). A study on the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the multidimensional experience avoidance questionnaire. Journal of the Korean Contents Association, 18 (1), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.01.517

Moradi, A., Barghi Irani, Z., Bagiyan Koulemarz, M., Kariminejad, K., & Zabet, M. (2018). Factor Determination and Psychometric Features of the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (MEAQ). Social Cognition, 6(2), 57-82.
URL: http://sc.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_4422.html?lang=en

Baran L., Hyla M., Kleszcz B. (2019). Elastyczność psychologiczna. Polska adaptacja narzędzi dla praktyków i badaczy. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. Read the book online at www.wydawnictwo.us.edu.pl/node/21733
See attachments for female and male versions of the MEAQ-30.

Sumalrot, T., Phannajit, N., & Phattharayuttawat, S. (2022). Psychometric Properties of Scales for Assessing Experiential Avoidance. Siriraj Medical Journal, 74(11), 760–768. https://doi.org/10.33192/Smj.2022.90

Phattrayuttrawat, S., Sumalrot, T. & Phannajit, N. (2019). A STUDY OF PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SELF-RATING SCALES FOR ASSESSING EXPERIENTIAL AVOIDANCE. Proceeding of Graduate Research Forum 2019 An Academic Conference for Graduate Student.

Halil Eksi, et al. (2018) MULTIDIMENSIONAL EXPERIENTIAL AVOIDANCE QUESTIONNAIRE-30: ADAPTATION AND PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE TURKISH VERSION. ULEAD 2018 Annual Congress: ICRE.  The MEAQ Turkish translation is in the article.

Landi, G. et al (2021). Italian Validation of the Italian Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 21, 57-65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.05.007 Italian Translation is in the appendix.

Lin, Y., Rogge, R.D., Swanson, D.P. (2020). Cross-cultural flexibility: Validation of the traditional Mandarin, simplified Mandarin, and Japanese translations of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.11.008 The MPFI Chinese translation is in Appendix A Supplementary data.

(Login into your ACBS account to see the attachments)

Lin, Y., Rogge, R.D., Swanson, D.P. (2020). Cross-cultural flexibility: Validation of the traditional Mandarin, simplified Mandarin, and Japanese translations of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.11.008 The MPFI Japanese translation is in Appendix A Supplementary data.

Norsk versjon kort og lang samt skåringsark tilgjengelig for egen bruk

Zahra Azadfar, Abbas Abdollahi, Indrajit Patra, Ya-Ping Chang, Tawfeeq Alghazali, Saad Ghazi Talib (2022). The Iranian form of psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-022-00236-w
. 

Pereira, C., Cunha, M., Massano-Cardoso, I., & Galhardo, A. (2023). Assessment of psychological (in)flexibility in the Portuguese population: Validation of the short version of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI-24). Portuguese Journal of Behavioural and Social Research, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2023.9.1.285

References:

Simkin, H., Freiberg-Hoffmann, A., Caselli, G., Prozzillo, P., Rogge, R. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2023). Adaptation and Validation into Spanish of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI): evidence of internal validity and factorial Invariance. Revista AJAYU, 21(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.35319/ajayu.212188 The MPFI Spanish version is in the Appendix.

Navarrete, J., Rodríguez-Freire, C., Sanabria-Mazo, J. P., Martínez-Rubio, D., McCracken, L. M., Gallego, A., Sundstrom, F. T. A., Serrat, M., Alonso, J., Feliu-Soler, A., Nieto, R., & Luciano, J. V. (2024). Psychometric examination of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory Short Form (MPFI-24) and the Psy-Flex Spanish versions in individuals with chronic pain. European Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.4704

References:

Tabrizi, F. F., Larsson, A., Grönvall, H., Söderstrand, L., Hallén, E., Champoux-Larsson, M., Lundgren, T., Sundström, F., Lavefjord, A., Buhrman, M., Sundin, Ö,. McCracken, L., Åhs, F., & Jansson, B. (2023). Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 52(4), 295-316. DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2022.2153077

Sundström, F.T.A., Lavefjord, A., Buhrman, M., & McCracken, L.M. (2023). Assessing Psychological Flexibility and Inflexibility in Chronic Pain Using the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). The Journal of Pain, 24(5), 770-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2022.11.010

GİZEM ULUBAY (2020) ÇOK BOYUTLU PSİKOLOJİK ESNEKLİK ENVANTERİNİN TÜRKÇEYE UYARLANMASI. T.C. BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, Master's Thesis.

Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory short form (MPFI-24) French Validation

Grégoire, S. et al (2020). Validation of the English and French versions of the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory short form (MPFI-24). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 18, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.06.004 The French Translation of the MPFI is in Appendix A.

References:

Fang, S., Huang, M, Wang, Y. (2023). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of personalized psychological flexibility index (C-PPFI) in college students. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 28, 23-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.03.008

Xia, W., Yan, M., Jiang, W., Ou, M., Xie, C., Liu, X., & Xu, X. (2023). Psychometric validation of the modified Chinese version of the personalized psychological flexibility index in patients with cancer. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 10(6), 100240.  DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100240.

Akbari, M., Disabato, D., Seydavi, M. & Zamani, E. (2021). The Persian Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index (P-PPFI): Psychometric properties in a general population sample of Iranians. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 22, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.09.004 The Persian PPFI is in Appendix A.

Kimya, E., Hatun, O., & Ekşi, H. (2024). Dispositional hope, psychological flexibility, and psychological distress: Psychometric properties of the Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index among Turkish adults. Psychological Assessment, 36(4), e1–e12. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001303

Psy-Flex Chinese version by: C. Y. Y. Chong
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

References:

Fang, S., Ding, D., Huang, M., & Zheng, Q. (2024). Chinese version of the Simplified Psychological Flexibility Scale-6 (C-Psy-Flex): study of its psychometric properties from the perspective of classical test theory and network analysis. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100769

Psy-Flex Dutch version by: Tom Van Daele
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Psy-Flex Finnish version by: Raimo Lappalainen
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Psy-Flex French version by Jean-Louis Monestès
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

German Validation Study: Gloster, A.T. et al (2021) Psy-Flex: A contextually sensitive measure of psychological flexibility. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 22, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.09.001 

The Psy-Flex German version is available at https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Validation study: Paraskeva-Siamata, M., Spyridou, G., Gloster, A., & Karekla, M., (2018, July). Psyflex: Validation of a new psychological flexibility measure in a Greek-Cypriot sample. Poster presented at the Association of Contextual Behavior Science annual world conference, Montreal, Canada.

The Psy-Flex Greek version is available at https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Psy-Flex Hebrew version by: D. Mouadeb
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/psychologie/Abteilungen/Clinical_Psychology_and_Intervention_Science/docs/psy-flex/psy-flex-heb.pdf

Psy-Flex Hungarian version by: Dorottya Őri
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Psy-Flex Italian version by: Giovambattista Presti
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Psy-Flex Korean version by: D. Jo
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

References
Jo, D., Seong, B., & Yang, E. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Psy-flex scale: A validation study in a community sample in Korea. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 30, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.09.004 The Psy-Flex Korean version is in the Appendix.

Psy-Flex Latvian version by: Jelena Lubenko
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Psy-Flex Montenegrin version by: Iva Ivanovic
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Psy-Flex Polish version by Bartosz Kleszcz
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Portuguese version by: David Manuel Dias Neto & Ana Nunes da Silva
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Neto, D.D., Mouadeb, D., Lemos, N., Gloster, A. T., & Perez, W. F. (2024). Contextual similarities in psychological flexibility: the Brazil-Portugal transcultural adaptation of Psy-Flex. Current Psychology (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06241-9

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-024-06241-9

References:
Cunha, M., Temido, A., Moniz, A., & Galhardo, A. (2024). Assessing psychological flexibility and mental health in adults: The Psy-Flex European Portuguese version. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 32, 100730. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100730

Cunha, M., Temido, A., Pinto-Gouveia, A., & Galhardo, A. (2023). Assessing psychological flexibility by the Psy-Flex and its relationship with mental health. European Psychiatry, 66(S1), S368-S369. DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.800

Cunha, M., & Temido, A. M. (2021). A versão Portuguesa da Psy-Flex [Manuscrito não publicado]. Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Centro de Investigação em Neuropsicologia e Intervenção Cognitivo-comportamental da Universidade de Coimbra.

Psy-Flex Romanian version by: Adriana Baban
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Psy-Flex Slovenian version by: David Gosar
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Psy-Flex Spanish version by Francisco Ruiz Jiménez, Maria Belén García-Martín & Miguel A. Segura-Vargas
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

References:
Navarrete, J., Rodríguez-Freire, C., Sanabria-Mazo, J. P., Martínez-Rubio, D., McCracken, L. M., Gallego, A., Sundstrom, F. T. A., Serrat, M., Alonso, J., Feliu-Soler, A., Nieto, R., & Luciano, J. V. (2024). Psychometric examination of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory Short Form (MPFI-24) and the Psy-Flex Spanish versions in individuals with chronic pain. European Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.4704

Psy-Flex Swedish version by: David Nilsson
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

Psy-Flex Turkish version by: Gökçen Aydın
https://psychologie.unibas.ch/en/faculty/centers/clinical-psychology-and-intervention-science/research/research-projects/psy-flex/#c24662

References:
Yıldırım, M., Aziz, I.A. (2023). Turkish validation of the Psy-Flex Scale and its association with resilience and social support. Environment and Social Psychology, 8(1), 1513. DOI: 10.18063/esp.v8.i1.1513

The AAQ has been developed for specific disorders, syndromes, and types of chronic disease.

Callaghan, G.M., Sandoz, E.K., Darrow, S.M., & Feeney, T.K. (2015). The Body Image Psychological Inflexibility Scale: Development and psychometric properties. Psychiatry Research, 226(1), 45-52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.039
 

McCracken, L.M., Vowles, K.E., & Eccleston, C. (2004) Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107(1–2), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.012
 

Reneman, M.F., Dijkstra, A., Geertzen, J.H., & Dijkstra, P.U. (2010). Psychometric properties of Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaires: A systematic review. European Journal of Pain, 14, 457-465. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.08.003