Skip to main content

Training and Competency Standards for Contextual Behavioral Science Practitioners

APA Citation

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. 

Bennett-Levy, J. (2019). Why therapists should walk the talk: The theoretical and empirical case for therapist self-practice self-reflection in cognitive behavioural therapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 26(1), 82–96. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2330

Callaghan, G. M., Summers, C. J., & Weidman, M. (2018). The crucial role of the therapeutic relationship in Functional Analytic Psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000181

Ciarrochi, J., Hayes, L., Oades, L. G., & Hofmann, S. G. (Eds.). (2016). Process-based supervision. Context Press/New Harbinger Publications.

Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2007). Competence in competency-based supervision practice: Construct and application. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(3), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.3.232

Gilbert, P. (2009). The compassionate mind: A new approach to life's challenges. Constable & Robinson.

Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012b). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Hayes, S. C., Villatte, M., Levin, M. E., & Hildebrandt, M. J. (2012a). Open, aware, and active: Contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 141–168. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032510-143210

Haynes, S. N., & O'Brien, W. H. (2000). Principles and practice of behavioral assessment. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Hays, P. A. (2016). Addressing cultural complexities in practice: Assessment, diagnosis, and therapy (3rd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1037/14801-000

Kaslow, N. J., Grus, C. L., Campbell, L. F., & Fouad, N. A., Hatcher, R. L., & Rodolfa, E. R. (2009). Competency assessment toolkit for professional psychology. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(4, Suppl), S27–S45. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015833

Kohlenberg, R. J., Kanter, J. W., Bolling, M. Y., Parker, C. R., & Tsai, M. (2009). Functional Analytic Psychotherapy: A behavioral approach to intensive treatment. In M. Hersen (Ed.), Clinical behavior therapy: Adults and children (pp. 145-166). John Wiley & Sons.

Kohlenberg, R. J., & Tsai, M. (1991). Functional Analytic Psychotherapy: Creating intense and curative therapeutic relationships. Plenum Press.

Kraiger, K. (2012). Perspectives on training and development. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 553-578). Oxford University Press.

Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.

Luoma, J. B., Hayes, S. C., & Walser, R. D. (2017). Learning ACT: An acceptance & commitment therapy skills-training manual for therapists (2nd ed.). New Harbinger Publications/Context Press.

Persons, J. B. (2008). The case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy. Guilford Press.

Villatte, M., Villatte, J. L., & Hayes, S. C. (2015). Mastering the clinical conversation: Language as intervention. Guilford Press.

Villas-Bôas, A., Meyer, S. B., & Kanter, J. W. (2015). Challenges and directions for research on FAP training and dissemination: A survey of professionals. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.07.001

Walser, R. D., & Westrup, D. (2007). Acceptance & commitment therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder & trauma-related problems: A practitioner's guide to using mindfulness & acceptance strategies. New Harbinger Publications.

Waltz, J., Addis, M. E., Koerner, K., & Jacobson, N. S. (1993). Testing the integrity of a psychotherapy protocol: Assessment of adherence and competence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 620–630. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.620

Publication Topic
Professional Issues in Contextual Behavioral Science
Publication Type
Article
Language
English
Keyword(s)
Contextual Behavioral Science, CBS, training, competence, standards, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, ACT, supervision, evidence-based practice
Abstract

Contextual Behavioral Science (CBS) represents a significant evolution in behavioral and cognitive therapies, emphasizing functional analysis, context, and core behavioral processes like acceptance, mindfulness, and values. As CBS approaches, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP), and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)-informed methods, become more widespread, the need for clearly defined training pathways and competency standards becomes critical. This article reviews the current landscape of training in CBS, identifies core competencies essential for effective practice, discusses various training models and assessment methods, and highlights ongoing challenges and future directions. Establishing robust, empirically supported standards is crucial for ensuring practitioner competence, promoting treatment fidelity, protecting the public, and advancing the field of CBS responsibly. Challenges include the diversity within CBS, the need for process-based training, and the development of reliable competency assessment tools. Future efforts should focus on consensus-building, empirical validation of training outcomes, and integration of cultural humility and ethical considerations into competency frameworks.