Climbing Our Hills: A Beginning Conversation on the Comparison of ACT and CBT

Printer-friendly version
APA Citation: 

Hayes, S. C. (2008). Climbing our hills: A beginning conversation on the comparison of acceptance and commitment therapy and traditional cognitive behavioral therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 5, 286-295.

Publication Topic: 
ACT: Conceptual
Behavior Analysis: Conceptual
Contextualism
Contextual Methodology & Scientific Strategy
Other Third-Wave Therapies: Conceptual
RFT: Conceptual
Publication Type: 
Article
Language: 
English
Keyword(s): 
acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, contextualism, mediational analysis, processes of change, relational frame theory
Abstract: 

The history and developmental program of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and relational frame theory (RFT) is described, and against that backdrop the target article is considered. In the authors’ comparison of ACT and traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), traditional CBT does not refer to specific processes, principles, or theories but to a tribal tradition. Framed in that way, comparisons of ACT and CBT cannot succeed intellectually, because CBT cannot be pinned down. At the level of theory, change processes, and outcomes, ACT/RFT seems to be progressing as measured against its own goals.

This page contains attachments restricted to ACBS members. Please join or login with your ACBS account.