2-Day Pre-Conference Workshop CE Evaluations - 23-24 July | Association for Contextual Behavioral Science

If you registered and qualified for CEs, your CE certificate will be emailed to you by 28 September. All certificates are sent via SimpleCert, so check your email for "certificates@simplecert.net".

If you have any problems/issues/questions completing this form, please contact Abbie at support@contextualscience.org.

Your Name:

Email Address:

Your profession:

Psychologist

Medical Professional

Masters Level Licensed Therapist

Student

Administrator

University Faculty

BCBA

Other…

Please select all that apply.

Please note years in your profession:

Student

1-5 years

6-10 years

11-20 years

20+ years

Type of CEs you need:

CEs for Psychologists (APA type)

BCBA CEUs

CEs for BCBAs are only available for select pre-conference workshops, please see details here: https://contextualscience.org/wc2024_ce_credits

Please select the 2-Day workshop attended:

Helping build flexible relationships toward the self and the social world: Using CBS to support flexible growth in self and social connections with people aged 12 to 24 years

Creating a State-of-the-Art Process-Based Practice: The Role of AI, EMA, Functional Analysis and Digital Technology

Maria Karekla, Ph.D., Andrew Gloster, Ph.D., Steve Hayes, Ph.D.

Language Matters. Moving from Formula to Function: Progressing Applications of Behaviour Analysis with RFT and ACT

Nanni Presti, Ph.D., Sarah Cassidy, Ph.D.

Focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Powerful Behavior Change Services for All People

Patti Robinson, Ph.D., Kirk Strosahl, Ph.D.

Mastering Compassion Focused Practice from The Inside Out: An Experiential Introduction to Compassion Focused Therapy and Compassionate Mind Training

Dennis Tirch Ph.D., Laura Silberstein-Tirch, PsyD, Manuela O'Connell, Lic.

Here, Now, and Between Us: Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP) and the Power of the Therapeutic Relationship

Mavis Tsai, Ph.D., Sarah Sullivan-Singh, Ph.D., Barbara Kohlenberg, Ph.D., Amanda Muñoz Martínez. Ph.D., Daniel Maitland, Ph.D.

Healing Interrupted Lives: Using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Process-Based Work to Recover from Trauma

Robyn D. Walser, Ph.D.

Instruction

Questions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #1 was met. Find a list of the workshop's educational objectives on the individual workshop pages listed here: https://contextualscience.org/wc2024_preconference_workshops	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #2 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #3 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #4 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #5 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #6 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #7 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #8 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #9 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #10 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #11 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #12 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #13 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #14 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #15 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #16 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Learning objective #17 was met.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Accuracy and utility of content were discussed.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Instruction was appropriate to postdoctoral level training.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Teaching methods were effective.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content.	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable

First Instructor

Instructor Name:

Instructor Evaluation:

Questions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Knew the subject matter	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Taught the subject competently	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Elaborated upon the stated objectives	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Presented content in an organized manner	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Maintained my interest	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Answered questions effectively	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree

Second Instructor

Instructor Name:

Instructor Evaluation:

Questions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Knew the subject matter	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Taught the subject competently	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Elaborated upon the stated objectives	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Presented content in an organized manner	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Maintained my interest	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Answered questions effectively	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree

Third Instructor

Instructor Name:

Instructor Evaluation:

Questions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Knew the subject matter	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Taught the subject competently	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Elaborated upon the stated objectives	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Presented content in an organized manner	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Maintained my interest	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Answered questions effectively	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree

Fourth Instructor

Instructor Name:

Instructor Evaluation:

Questions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Knew the subject matter	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Taught the subject competently	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Elaborated upon the stated objectives	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Presented content in an organized manner	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Maintained my interest	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Answered questions effectively	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree

Fifth Instructor

Instructor Name:

Instructor Evaluation:

Questions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Knew the subject matter	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Taught the subject competently	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Elaborated upon the stated objectives	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Presented content in an organized manner	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Maintained my interest	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Answered questions effectively	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree
Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree

Professional & Ethical Issues

Presenter (or program chair, etc.) made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following:

Questions	Yes	No
Requirements for successful completion of activity	Yes	No
Commercial support for CE program, sponsor, or instructor (or any other relationship that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest)	Yes	No
Commercial support for content of instruction (e.g., research grants funding research findings etc.) that could be construed as a conflict of interest	Yes	No
Commercial support or benefit for endorsement of products (e.g., books, training, drugs, etc.)	Yes	No
Accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught and the severe and most common risks	Yes	No

Venue, Setting, etc.

Questions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Facility was adequate for my needs	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Special needs were met	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Facility was comfortable and accessible	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Food and beverage were adequate	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Advertised information was informative and accurate	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable

Learning

Questions	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Information could be applied to my practice (if applicable)	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Information could contribute to achieving personal or professional goals	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Cultural, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and gender differences were considered	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable
Presenter(s) described any known limitations for material presented, as well as any known contradictory evidence and its sources	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neither Agree nor Disagree	Agree	Strongly Agree	Not Applicable

Questions	Very Little	Little	Some	A Good Bit	A Great Deal
How much did you learn as a result of this CE program?:	Very Little	Little	Some	A Good Bit	A Great Deal
How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development?	Very Little	Little	Some	A Good Bit	A Great Deal

Questions	Yes	No
Did this program enhance your professional expertise?	Yes	No
Would you recommend this program to others?	Yes	No
Teaching methods and tools focused on how to apply program content to my practice/work environment.	Yes	No
Learning was enhanced through a variety of media utilizing auditory, visual, and multimedia formats.	Yes	No
The presentation facilitated the integration and synthesis of information.	Yes	No

Narrative

What was your overall impression of the activity? What went well? What could have been improved?

What did you learn that was new or different? How and/or will this information change how you practice?

What topics or presenters would you like to see for future workshops?

Other Comments (optional)

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

2-Day Pre-Conference Workshop CE Evaluations - 23-24 July

First Instructor

Second Instructor

Third Instructor

Fourth Instructor

Fifth Instructor

Share This Page