Tyndalla, I., Waldeck, D., Riva, P., Wesselmann, E.D., & Pancani, L. (2018) Psychological flexibility and ostracism: Experiential avoidance rather than cognitive fusion moderates distress from perceived ostracism over time.

Printer-friendly version
APA Citation: 

Tyndalla, I., Waldeck, D., Riva, P., Wesselmann, E.D., & Pancani, L. (2018) Psychological flexibility and ostracism: Experiential avoidance rather than cognitive fusion moderates distress from perceived ostracism over time. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 7, 72-80. 

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.02.001

Publication Topic: 
CBS: Conceptual
CBS: Empirical
Publication Type: 
Article
Language: 
English
Keyword(s): 
Ostracism Psychological flexibility Experiential avoidance Cognitive fusion Cognitive defusion Distress
Abstract: 

Psychological inflexibility has been found to moderate psychological distress following perceived ostracism. Two component processes of psychological inflexibility, experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion, are considered key in exacerbating general emotional distress. The present study (n = 286) examined whether both experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion moderate distress from perceived ostracism or whether one of these processes alone underpins the moderation effect of psychological inflexibility. In a structural equation model analysis, when accounting for both factors, experiential avoidance moderated distress from perceived ostracism alone. Thus, it seems that experiential avoidance is a key driver underlying emotional regulation of psychological distress in the context of perceived ostracism.

Comments: 
Read the whole article on the ACBS website https://contextualscience.org/article/psychological_flexibility_and_ostracism_experiential_avoidance_rather_than