Skip to main content

Levin-Aspenson, Marks, Dalrymple, & Zimmerman. 2023

APA Citation

Levin-Aspenson, H.F., Marks, R.M., Dalrymple, K.L., & Zimmerman, M. (2023). Does the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire measure the same constructs before and after ACT-based treatment? Examination of the longitudinal measurement invariance of the 24-item FFMQ-SF. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 29, 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.07.001

Publication Topic
ACT: Empirical
Publication Type
Article
Language
English
Keyword(s)
Factor analysis, Measurement invariance, Mindfulness, Measurement, Assessment, Self-report, Questionnaire, Treatment, Acceptance and commitment therapy
Abstract

Violations of longitudinal measurement invariance (LMI) suggest “response shifts” in individuals’ understanding and appraisal of items over time and result in misinterpretation of observed changes in outcome measures. These concerns are crucial to the validity of outcome measures and are particularly relevant in examining the effectiveness of mindfulness and other process-based interventions. In the current report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, we examine the LMI of the 24-item short form of the Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire from intake to discharge in a large, diagnostically heterogeneous sample of psychiatric patients (n = 2928) participating in an acceptance and commitment therapy-based partial hospitalization program. The original five-factor structure required correlated error terms for items with similar wording (Nonjudging of Experience and Describe scales) to achieve acceptable fit. Following these modifications, we found evidence of configural and weak invariance for all scales. We found evidence for strong invariance for Nonjudging of Experience, Nonreactivity to Inner Experiences, Describe, and Observing, but not for Acting with Awareness. Strict invariance was not supported. Results highlight the challenges of measuring constructs involving overt metacognitive processes via self-report. Implications for scale development and clinical practice are discussed.

To find the full text version of this article and other JCBS articles (as well as download a full text pdf.), ACBS members need to login and then access the JCBS ScienceDirect homepage here. Click here if you'd like to learn more about joining ACBS.