Skip to main content

Feather & Williams. 2022

APA Citation

Feather, G. & Williams, M. (2022). The moderating effects of psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility on the relationship between climate concern and climate-related distress. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 23, 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.12.007

Publication Topic
ACT: Empirical
Publication Type
Article
Language
English
Keyword(s)
Climate change, Climate-related distress, Eco-anxiety, Moderation analysis, Acceptance and commitment therapy, Psychological flexibility, Psychological inflexibility
Abstract

Objective

This study investigated the moderating roles of psychological flexibility and inflexibility on the relationship between climate concern and climate-related distress. It was hypothesised that higher levels of psychological flexibility would negatively moderate the relationship between climate concern and climate-related distress, while higher levels of psychological inflexibility would positively moderate the same relationship.

Methods

A moderation analysis was performed in R on a sample of 771 participants from the Prolific recruitment platform. Participants completed a survey which included a climate change concern index, the Climate Change Anxiety Scale, the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory, and the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire.

Results

The interaction term between climate-related distress and psychological inflexibility was significant (b = −0.07, SE = 0.03, p < 0.05), indicating that psychological inflexibility is a moderator of the association between concern about climate change and climate-related distress. This model explained 23% of the variance of climate-related distress symptomatology. For the same level of concern about climate change, participants who reported higher psychological inflexibility, reported higher levels of climate-related distress.

Discussion

Higher psychological inflexibility may be a risk factor for climate-related distress symptomatology, particularly for those who indicate greater concern about climate change. These findings contribute to the broader psychological flexibility literature in support of using ACT-based interventions for those experiencing significant distress associated with global crises such as climate change.

To find the full text version of this article and others (as well as download a full text pdf.), ACBS members can visit the ScienceDirect homepage here