Siri Ming:
I know I make a lot of announcements about the important-to-me things that I have coming up. Today though I am sharing about this fantastic and exciting opportunity I was just given to be "a speaker at our upcoming Conference World Conference on Astronomy, Neutrino Physics, Space Science"! Should I accept???? Could write off a trip to Amsterdam and get all kinds of "Exposure and Networking Opportunities"!
(For those of my friends not in academic circles, we all get dozens of requests for weird predatory publishing and conferencing things. Mine are usually a bit closer to my actual field though...)
Suggestion:
It’s all verbal behavior so “go for it”. Jordan’s RDT and RFT’s component/composite, emergent structures, feedback loops, and self-organizing structures and relations will fit in nicely.
You could also talk on how stochastic determinism and relational networking plays a role in creating behavioral variability and gives human behavior the facade of consciousness and free will.
And how “consciousness” is an emergent property of relational responding within a “hypergraph”
Well, that’s what I might present
That and how RFT is our current best model of “the observer”…an interest to physicist as they try to grapple with why we, as a sentient structure, observe what we do and, subsequently, reduce those observations to averages and equivalences.
This approach may find footing with your audience as it is a “network” approach to understanding human observer behavior and that capacity directly influences our modeling of physics.
They’re now all about LLM’s and neural network models, none of it informed by RFT and VB data.
Skinner: “The discovery of neurological facts may proceed independently of a science of behavior if the facts are directly observed as structural and functional changes in tissue, but before such a fact may be shown to account for a fact of behavior, both must be quantitatively described and shown to correspond in all their properties.”