In a recent text sent to colleagues, Siri Ming wrote: "I know I make a lot of announcements about the important-to-me things that I have coming up. Today though I am sharing about this fantastic and exciting opportunity I was just given to be "a speaker at our upcoming Conference World Conference on Astronomy, Neutrino Physics, Space Science"! Should I accept???? Could write off a trip to Amsterdam and get all kinds of "Exposure and Networking Opportunities"! (For those of my friends not in academic circles, we all get dozens of requests for weird predatory publishing and conferencing things. Mine are usually a bit closer to my actual field though...) "
Suggestion: Discuss how plying, tracking and augmenting alters the "encoding" and "decoding" of experimental data and the organization of that data into explanatory relational networks and how those plying, tracking, augmental and relational verbal responses may be flexibly contextualized within a "creative problem solving repertoire" and how such a repertoire may be established and practiced idiographically.
Why? Because physicist love to figure out how things work and the cutting edge problems being studied are full of contradictions and unkowns that are challening the current formulations and utility of conventional tracts, plys and augmentals.