Skip to main content

Over and undergeneralization of behavior analytic terminology and their influence on the trouble with terms

APA Citation

Posey, J. L., Robertson, F. M., Moon, E. I., Marrer, C. A., & Dixon, M. R. (2025). Over and Undergeneralization of Behavior Analytic Terminology and their Influence on the Trouble with Terms. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 38, 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100958

Publication Topic
CBS: Conceptual
Publication Type
Article
Language
English
Keyword(s)
ABA definitions; Technology; Jargon; Technical drift; Terminology
Abstract

Behavior analysts rely upon the use of technical terms to communicate with one another succinctly. At times, however, they are also called to translate terminology into lay terms, which may lead toward drift if there is insufficient understanding of the technology. To explore this issue, 139 participants, comprised of 102 board certified behavior analysts (BCBAs) and 37 that were not, evaluated 24 definitions across four terminological categories, including Applied Behavior Analytic (ABA), pseudo-ABA, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and mainstream psychological term definitions. Results showed that behavior analysts ranked ABA term definitions as most closely aligned with behavior analytic principles, with pseudo-ABA term definitions ranking as the second most, and ACT and psychological definitions ranking third and fourth, respectively. Statistical analyses supplemented visual inspection of the data and resulted in significance at the p < .001 level. Concerns about over and under-generalization of behavior analytic principles are discussed.

To find the full text version of this article and other JCBS articles (as well as download a full text pdf.), ACBS members need to login and then access the JCBS ScienceDirect homepage here. Click here if you'd like to learn more about joining ACBS.