Skip to main content

Examining the effectiveness of self-help plus for unaccompanied refugee minors: A cluster randomized trial

APA Citation

Morroni, D., Presti, G., & Karekla, M. (2026). Examining the Effectiveness of Self-Help Plus for Unaccompanied Refugee Minors: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 42, 101030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2026.101030 

Publication Topic
ACT: Empirical
Publication Type
Article
Language
English
Keyword(s)
Acceptance and commitment therapy; Self-help plus; Unaccompanied refugee minors; Psychological flexibility; Quality of life
Abstract

Background

Self-Help Plus (SH+) is an intervention found to reduce psychological distress in adult refugees. To date, SH + has not been examined with refugee youth. The purpose of this study was to explore whether an adapted SH + intervention can improve quality of life (QoL), psychological flexibility (PF) and psychological symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in unaccompanied refugee minors (UM).

Methods

A cluster randomized controlled trial was carried out in six shelters across Cyprus. Participants were 101 UM between 13 and 18 years old. Randomization occurred by shelters hosting UM, where they either received the four-session SH + intervention (n = 54, Mage = 15.36 years, 22 males, 32 females) or were in the wait-list control group (n = 47, Mage = 16.66 years, 27 males, 20 females). Mixed design analysis of variance and reliable change index analyses were performed on the outcome measures.

Results

In contrast to hypotheses, the intervention group did not differ significantly from the wait-list control group on primary outcomes (i.e., QoL, PF) or secondary outcomes (i.e., mental health symptoms).

Conclusions

Although improvements in psychological symptoms were observed over time in both groups, these changes cannot be attributed specifically to the intervention. These findings highlight the need for further research to examine the applicability of SH + for refugee youth. This can be done by using: (a) culturally and developmentally appropriate measures, (b) enhanced strategies to support engagement, and (c) study designs that consider the complex contextual stressors affecting UM and the practical challenges of research in shelter environments.
 

To find the full text version of this article and other JCBS articles (as well as download a full text pdf.), ACBS members need to login and then access the JCBS ScienceDirect homepage here. Click here if you'd like to learn more about joining ACBS.