Publishing RFT research
Since one of the activities in which many RFT interested folk will be involved in is publishing RFT research then one key objective of the SIG has to do with supporting publication with respect to the review process.
RFT researchers will likely come up against very similar criticisms in the peer review process. Thus one aim of the current space is a place in which people can insert general review feedback that may be of use to others in the future.
If you have any such reviewers feedback it might help others if you could post it below. Please do not post full reviews as that is not the purpose of the page. Instead, it would be helpful if you could give the context of the feedback (e.g., the journal involved, the issue at hand) and some comment as to why you think it might be useful for people to see this feedback.