Skip to main content

Varieties of Contextualism

Analytic goals are vitally important to the contextualistic world view. This is because the analytic tools of contextualism—its root metaphor and truth criterion—both hinge on the purpose of the analysis, and neither can be mounted effectively without a clearly specified analytic goal. (Reese, 1993, p. 77).

Likewise, the root metaphor of the "act-in-context" is rendered meaningless in an analysis without an explicit goal because there would be no basis on which to restrict the analysis to a subset of the infinite expanse of the act’s historical and environmental context (Hayes, 1993b).  Without a clear analytic goal, the contextualist could analyze the endless context of an act in perpetuity, without ever knowing when the analysis was complete or good enough to be deemed

Contextualists can, and do, adopt different analytic goals, and the many different varieties of contextualism can be distinguished by their goals.  Based on their overarching analytic goals, contextualistic theories can be divided into two general categories: descriptive contextualism and functional_contextualism

  Descriptive Contextualism Functional Contextualism
Example Social Constructionism Behavior Analysis

Analytic goal

To understand the complexity and richness of a whole event through an appreciation of its participants and features To predict and influence events with precision, scope, and depth using empirically-based concepts and rules
Knowledge constructed Personal, ephemeral, specific, local, and spatiotemporally restricted (e.g., a historical narrative) General, abstract, and spatiotemporally unrestricted (e.g., a scientific principle)
Content and focus Individual-in-context Behavior-in-context
Preferred methods Qualitative and narrative Quantitative and experimental
Disciplinary type Natural history Natural science

This page contains attachments restricted to ACBS members. Please join or login with your ACBS account.